Operational effectiveness measures in manufacturing

In this special issue, PricewaterhouseCoopers asked a panel of senior executives from large US-based industrial manufacturers about operational effectiveness and costreduction programs in their organizations.

Solid success with low-cost country outsourcing
Outsourcing manufacturing to low-cost countries remains a prevalent cost-reduction strategy among respondents. Fifty-three percent of US-based industrial manufacturers have either undertaken an outsourcing venture in the past two years (46%) or plan to do so within the next 12 months (7%). Forty-one percent reflect no involvement. Outsourcing’s appeal is likely a product of its success. Seventy percent of survey participants rated their experiences successful (66%) or extremely successful (4%) and only 26% indicated mixed results. None rated its outsourcing efforts unsuccessful.

Mixed results on Lean and Six Sigma
While outsourcing is a prevailing strategy for cost savings, Lean and Six Sigma are the focus for operational effectiveness. Seventy-three percent of US manufacturers actively deploy either Lean (44%) or Six Sigma (39%) to their organization’s operations. Surprisingly, 22% utilize neither methodology. However, senior executives report there is room for improvement. While 49% are satisfied, stating their programs are effective (44%) or extremely effective (5%), an almost equal number (47%) had mixed reviews.

Lean progresses to non-manufacturing functions
Meanwhile, of those who employ Lean concepts to their manufacturing operations, one-half are also extending it to other functional areas. Of these, 92% are extending its principles to their supply chain operations, 77% to their engineering function, 69% to their product development processes, and 54% to their customer service area

Dissatisfaction with distribution and logistics
Senior executives expressed displeasure with their organizations’ distribution network and logistics approach. Thirty-seven percent were satisfied, with 30% reporting their distribution and logistics were effective and 7% reporting theirs were extremely effective. However, a plurality (54%) felt there was room for improvement. Fortynine percent had mixed reviews and 5% believed theirs were ineffective. In PwC's view, this lack of satisfaction is not surprising. There is a need for distribution networks and logistics strategies to evolve so they support new business models that include global supply chains and outsourced manufacturing.

Supply chain and risk assessments on the rise
As a result of these perceived gaps, 58% have taken steps to resolve inadequacies within the past 12 months. Fortyeight percent conducted supply chain effectiveness assessments and 39% conducted risk assessments. However, only 27% cited extremely or very effective results, while 65% cited mixed results and 3 percent cited ineffective results. The interesting fact here is that 39% of respondents completed risk assessments, a large number if one considers that as recently as two years ago this practice was not typical.


Chart 1
Expand graphic




Chart 2
Expand graphic




Chart 3
Expand graphic




Chart 4
Expand graphic




Chart 5
Expand graphic




Chart 6
Expand graphic




Chart 7
Expand graphic

More information

Contact
Karen Vitale
US Industrial Products Advisory Leader
+1 973 236 5347

Mike Giguere
Operations Effectiveness
+1 617 803 6377




Publications Search Page

© 2008 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
Accessibility information Skip navigation Countries online