A lot has changed since the start of the year: inflation is decelerating; interest rates may be near their apex; some banks have failed; the US debt ceiling crisis has been averted; and it seems people everywhere are buzzing about the next Big Thing in tech: generative AI. For very different reasons—from digitalisation to decarbonisation to doubling down on value creation—all the ferment is creating dynamic market conditions that we believe will create transformation opportunities and the right conditions for a more buoyant M&A market over the coming months.
The M&A activity ahead may not all be eye-catching megadeals, which have ebbed since hitting their peak in 2021, but rather a healthier level of mid-market deals as companies pursue their strategic growth agendas. These smaller deals can also drive transformation and growth. While cash-rich corporates remain well positioned to make larger moves, we see mid-market transactions dominating the market in coming months as CEOs use a program of both strategic acquisitions and select divestitures to transform their portfolios for the future.
We began 2023 with a cautious M&A outlook. The global economy was clouded by recession fears and rising interest rates as central bankers sought to tame record inflation in many regions. And there’s no disputing that the first half of this year has been challenging for many dealmakers, with deal volumes declining by 8% from already subdued levels in the second half of 2022. Deal volumes nonetheless remain above pre-pandemic 2019 levels.
Deal flow could open up in the second half of the year, especially if sellers focus on pre-sale preparation and readjust expectations about pricing. But for many buyers, financing has become more difficult—and a lot more expensive. That is placing more emphasis on alternative funding and how to create value from a deal.
Value creation has, of course, always been a guiding principle for dealmakers, but today, there is a real need to go deeper and identify additional—often transformational—levers of value that can help realise each transaction’s full potential. We are already seeing greater focus on strategic repositioning—for example, through portfolio optimisation, digitalisation and business model changes. But some less-considered levers, such as energy efficiency, green tax credits and sustainable financing, are worth a closer look.
Technology is empowering decision-making and enabling CEOs to digitalise and transform businesses. And AI has just upped the game. AI’s disruptive impact on companies and the economy will create M&A opportunities as both corporates and private equity (PE) firms move to acquire new businesses or potentially exit them to monetise returns. We’ve been seeing for some time the growing skills challenge faced by organisations driving acquisition strategies. AI has upped the game here too, with AI talent being one of the scarcest resources to find.
Transformation is happening elsewhere, too. Companies are increasingly looking to reduce their impact on climate and pursue net-zero strategies. The energy transition is creating huge disruption in some sectors, with opportunities for M&A along the way. For example, automotive and industrial OEMs are acquiring mining companies to secure supply of critical minerals necessary for battery production and energy storage.
In a world of rapid change, CEOs need to adopt a bold M&A strategy to enable them to keep ahead of the competition. But bold doesn’t have to mean big. M&A can transform business models in many forms. Portfolio reviews will be a key area of focus for both corporates and PE firms as they look to make a series of smaller transactions on their transformation journey. Smaller, more mid-market deals may be easier to get done in today’s difficult financing and regulatory environment—and they can be transformational, too, if they form part of a well-planned acquisition or disposal program. Cash-rich corporates are best positioned to do larger, more transformational deals while balancing the regulatory influences being encountered. Lower public company valuations will create public to private opportunities for private equity. The expected uptick in restructuring may lead to distressed M&A. But before sellers make their move, preparation is key.
‘The M&A market is more resilient than the headline numbers might suggest. It’s a buyer’s market out there now, especially for cash-rich corporate acquirors and middle-market deals. So it’s essential for sellers to work harder to prepare for upcoming sales—or risk losing out.’
The macroeconomic conditions and tight financing markets have created a deal environment in which processes are taking longer, with more uncertain outcomes, more challenging business cases, and the need for deeper due diligence.
Buyers are already feeling the pressure to justify their investment thesis and a robust business case. If they can’t also identify opportunities for value creation and quantify various outcomes, their deal may never see the light of day. They will also need to invest incremental resources and be purposeful about securing capital. In today’s market, financing should not be taken for granted. Traditional funding sources may no longer be available or may only be on terms that do not align with the deal’s expected return.
Sellers cannot prepare enough. We repeat: in this market, sellers cannot prepare enough. A year ago, with an abundance of cheap capital powering a highly competitive M&A market, sellers could limit buyer information and questions and still extract a premium. Today, to complete a deal and avoid price reductions, sellers should anticipate a greater level of scrutiny from buyers and their funding sources, and they will need to be “deal ready”. Warning: this process can be time-consuming. But a classic mistake we see all too often is sellers and their bankers establishing aggressive sale timelines. These limit management’s ability to adequately plan, prepare and optimise the business before it hits the market and, in the worst case, can cause the deal to fall through.
What buyers want | How can sellers get “deal ready”? |
---|---|
Buyers are paying more attention to: | Savvy sellers need to prepare: |
|
|
A trusted vision of the business’s full potential |
‘Deals that can bring about strategic business model transformations are more relevant than ever in the current market, and we expect “Transact to Transform” to be a major theme as M&A starts to pick up again in coming months.’
We expect portfolio reviews will be a key area of focus for both corporates and PE firms. Such reviews represent a hallmark of strong leadership and smart business decision-making that can help identify key strategic gaps (in capabilities or products) that acquisitions can help to fill. They also serve to identify non-core or underperforming assets that can be divested and enable businesses facing challenges in their funding structure to take action to optimise their balance sheets. Three main factors will influence these decisions:
According to PwC’s recent study, The power of portfolio renewal and the value in divestitures, companies most likely to create value proactively review their portfolio and consider and complete divestitures via timely decision-making processes. With acquisitions having outnumbered divestitures by more than a four-to-one ratio over the past two years, we believe it is likely that a significant number of assets within corporate portfolios today may be good candidates to divest—and the to-be-divested assets will provide buying opportunities for others.
We are seeing a divergence in the current M&A market between larger deals and smaller, mid-market ones. Larger deals, while often more transformational in nature, have become harder to complete in the current financing environment and are facing more regulatory scrutiny. Smaller deals are less affected by market volatility, often being viewed as the staple of dealmaking activity, allowing companies to take a series of steps on their transformation journey rather than one giant leap.
Deal volumes decreased by approximately 8% between the second half of 2022 and the first half of 2023. For the larger deals greater than US$1bn in deal value, the decline was almost twice as large. The number of deals of US$1bn or more has declined by approximately 58% since the record M&A year in 2021. By contrast, deal volumes for deals less than US$1bn declined by approximately 24% over the same period.
Corporates with strong balance sheets and sound M&A processes will likely have a competitive advantage in the current market. They have the cash and the ability to extract synergies and may seize the moment to make acquisitions while the tough financing environment is reducing competition for assets. However, this window of opportunity won’t stay open forever.
Corporates have set the pace for larger deals this year—with corporate buyers accounting for two-thirds of the announced megadeals—as PE has focused more heavily on portfolio company transformation and M&A, as well as on public-to-private deals. Some of the largest deals in the first half of 2023 are also examples of how companies are doing transformational transactions: for instance, Pfizer’s US$43bn announced acquisition of Seagen; Glencore’s approximately US$23bn proposed merger with Teck Resources; Newmont’s US$19.2bn announced acquisition of Newcrest Mining; Carrier’s US$13.2bn announced acquisition of Viessmann Climate Solutions; and Xylem’s approximately US$7.5bn announced acquisition of Evoqua Water Technologies.
The sectors witnessing the highest level of megadeals activity—pharma and life sciences and the energy, utilities and resources sectors—are those associated with megatrends such as technological innovation, digitalisation, ESG and the energy transition.
Don’t underestimate the ingenuity of PE firms. While the macro environment and financing challenges from rising interest rates and tightening credit have hampered leveraged dealmaking, PE players have shifted their focus towards the portfolio, performing portfolio reviews, executing bolt-on acquisitions, and investing in cloud transformation and data and analytics capabilities. While larger buyouts have been less prevalent than in prior years, PE firms with conviction around a specific asset will not shy away from pursuing strategic platform acquisitions, acquiring alternative asset classes within private markets and taking advantage of public market valuations via take-privates.
Recent US bank failures led to a further tightening of credit in what was already a difficult financing market. The PE-leveraged buyout model involves acquiring a company by borrowing and then leveraging the target company’s assets and cash flow to repay the debt. As such, although PE dry powder remains at record levels (US$2.5tn1 as of June 2023), access to debt financing is fundamental. PE players are using a combination of financing structures such as term loans, seller notes, all-equity funding, earn-outs, consortium deals (including with sovereign wealth funds, pension funds and family offices), and minority investments to finance important deals.
Private credit has provided a much-needed source of capital to PE funds, albeit at a premium, and is opening up new transaction avenues for them. In addition, some of the biggest PE funds have raised credit funds or announced plans to acquire them, such as TPG’s US$2.7bn proposed acquisition of Angelo Gordon, an alternative investment firm focused on credit and real estate investing.
The higher cost of capital is creating greater pressure on PE firms to generate returns. However, PE funds grow ever more sophisticated in their investment approach and—with a greater emphasis on identifying different sources of value within a deal, together with a focus on sustainable investments—are employing a combination of operational enhancements and more transformational moves to create value for their investors. Take-private deals are an example of where PE is typically less constrained than public companies, enabling them to implement strategic changes, focus on value creation and generate higher returns.
Some recent examples of take-private deals include the US$15.2bn proposed acquisition of Toshiba Corp by Japan Industrial Partners and the US$12.5bn proposed acquisition of Qualtrics by Silver Lake and CPP Investments. With the current market conditions, we expect PE firms will find further opportunities, particularly in the tech sector, to acquire some good quality companies with strong earnings potential at lower valuations.
‘While a valuation gap and macro challenges are undoubtedly slowing some M&A activity, the appetite of private equity appears undiminished. Deals with a strong strategic rationale, potential for significant value upside, and which are well-aligned to the global megatrends of digitalisation, deglobalisation and decarbonisation—such as in the tech, healthcare, infrastructure and renewables sectors—will get done.’
The uptick in restructuring activity in the first half of 2023 is expected to continue in the second half as financing pressures are becoming insurmountable for some, including the higher cost of debt, tight credit and challenges raising capital. These issues, combined with inflationary impacts, continued supply chain disruption and a low-growth economic environment, mean that several companies now face weak top line growth, margin pressures and a less certain future. The sectors expected to experience a higher level of restructuring activity include retail and consumer discretionary, real estate and industrials.
All things being equal, with a growing number of companies under stress, we would typically expect to see restructuring activity triggered by bank workout processes. For those companies with private credit debt rather than bank debt, we expect to see earlier action being taken to address problems and this more proactive approach to stimulate increased distressed M&A activity.
Companies that were able to secure fixed-rate debt at historically low rates during the pandemic are benefiting from lower financing costs. But those facing a refinancing event or with variable-rate debt are feeling the impact and need to take action. Restructuring to improve the ability to refinance is not just financial and it may come in different forms; for example, portfolio assessments to improve the balance sheet by selling parts of the business or operational restructuring to improve profitability and reduce risk.
On the not-too-distant horizon, the leveraged loan maturity wall in the US and Europe will see approximately US$250bn of institutional loans mature before 2026, of which approximately US$200bn will mature in 20252. If interest rates remain at current levels, this may reset borrowing rates to substantially higher levels. Or, in an even less favourable scenario, companies unable to refinance may need to restructure. In addition to traditional refinancings, we are seeing increased bond-for-loan takeouts to lock in fixed rates, as well as amend-to-extend activity to push out maturities with existing investors. Companies should keep a watchful eye on refinancing risks, and those that take early action to secure alternative capital sources when the opportunities present themselves will be better positioned for future success.
Click the tabs to view the chart and commentary for each region.
Global M&A volumes and values declined during the first half of 2023 (H1’23*) by 8% and 15%, respectively, from already subdued levels in the second half of 2022 (H2’22). When compared to the first half of 2022, the declines were 14% and 40%, respectively. Overall M&A activity has been uneven across regions and territories as different macroeconomic and other factors have played out, creating opportunities for investors who are willing to seek growth in other markets.
The technology, media and telecommunications (TMT) sector was the most active sector for dealmaking in H1’23*, accounting for approximately 28% of all global deal activity. However, when it came to deal values, the energy, utilities and resources (EU&R) sector led the way with 23% of deal value (on just 9% of deal volumes). The EU&R sector remains highly appealing to investors, primarily driven by substantial investments in the energy transition as companies seek to deliver on net zero emissions commitments.
Click the above tabs to view the chart and commentary for each region.
In the Asia–Pacific region, deal volumes fell by approximately 14% in H1’23* compared to H2’22, mainly due to declines in M&A activity in China, Australia and South Korea. In China, the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions is expected to lead to a recovery in the Chinese economy, and M&A activity is expected to pick up in the second half of the year. Australia and South Korea’s M&A markets have been affected by the broader macroeconomic challenges. Japan, however, has seen a different dynamic, with low interest rates and low inflation creating a more stable investing environment; M&A activity in Japan in H1’23* has been broadly consistent with H2’22. Japan has seen growing interest from foreign investors as a transfer of wealth continues to take place from some of the large conglomerates. India also has defied the broader global trend, with its M&A market remaining buoyant and deal volumes up 12% in H1’23* compared to H2’22. We expect the Indian market will remain active from a dealmaking perspective due to a strong economic growth outlook, investor interest in the start-up ecosystem and a stable business environment.
Click the above tabs to view the chart and commentary for each region.
In Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), deal volumes declined by 12% in H1’23* compared to H2’22 but remained above pre-pandemic 2019 levels. Deal values declined by 34% over the same period, primarily due to a decline in the number of megadeals. Macroeconomic factors, higher energy costs, and a drop in investor confidence affected both volumes and values. Almost all countries experienced a decline in deal volumes in H1’23* compared to H2’22, although Austria, Germany, Italy and Switzerland fared better than other countries in the region.
Click the above tabs to view the chart and commentary for each region.
In the Americas region, deal volumes increased by 3% in H1’23* compared to H2’22 but were 5% lower than in the first half of 2022 (H1’22). Deal values increased by 2% compared to H2’22 but were 35% lower than H1’22 levels due to a significant drop in the number of megadeals.
Click the above tabs to view the chart and commentary for each region.
Based on the green shoots we are seeing in the market, we are optimistic that the second half of the year will see more exciting—and transformational—M&A opportunities. There’s no doubt that the current macroeconomic conditions will continue to influence dealmaking activity, but a more stable interest rate environment will make it easier for dealmakers to price transactions. In our opinion, M&A is a more important growth driver today than in the recent past, and business leaders will be using it as a key tool to help them reposition their businesses, bolster growth and deliver sustained outcomes.
We believe cash-rich corporates looking for strategic opportunities may be the deal stars for the remainder of the year and that mid-market M&A will dominate, with divestitures driving much of the deal pipeline. For buyers, access to capital will be critical, along with more detailed financial and non-financial due diligence. For sellers, preparation will be the key to success.
Footnotes:
[1] Private equity dry powder of US$2.5tn is based on Preqin data as of 16 June 2023, as accessed on 16 June 2023.
[2] US and European leveraged loan maturity data is based on Pitchbook (LCD) data as of 31 May 2023, as accessed on 19 June 2023.
About the data
We have based our commentary on M&A trends on data provided by industry-recognised sources. Specifically, values and volumes referenced in this publication are based on officially announced transactions, excluding rumoured and withdrawn transactions, as provided by Refinitiv (LSEG) as of 31 May 2023 and as accessed on 2 June 2023. To facilitate meaningful comparisons with prior half-yearly periods, the data for the first half of 2023 (H1’23*) covers the first five months of the year, extrapolated to represent a six-month period. This adjustment ensures consistency in the analysis and allows for trend analysis across the reported timeframes. It does not represent a PwC forecast. The line chart which shows the percentage change in global deal volume, H1'19-H1'23* includes deals with a disclosed value US$0-1bn and US$1bn+ but does not include deals with an undisclosed deal value. Certain adjustments have been made to the source information to align with PwC’s industry mapping, and it has been supplemented by additional information from S&P Capital IQ and our independent research and analysis.