Beyond the back office: How managed services partnerships drive outperformance

Beyond the back office

As the managed services market shifts, both buyers and providers are moving beyond the old-school, cost-focused outsourcing arrangements that used to characterize it. While cost reduction is still an important consideration, today’s leading companies go further. They work with their managed services partners to close capability gaps and support strategic advantage in areas ranging from compliance and upskilling workers to gaining access to external data and innovating customer experiences, among others (see chart below).

Our research suggests a close correlation between financial outperformance and this broader approach to managed services partnering—a relationship that we’ve depicted along a maturity curve. The further companies journey along the curve, the more their performance premium increases (see chart below).

Consider level two of our maturity model, which includes companies exhibiting the least mature use of managed services partnerships (level one companies don’t use them at all). The exclusive focus that level two companies apply to cost savings in their MSPs nets them a 4% performance premium.

Meanwhile, at the next level of maturity (level three) companies turn to MSPs to close capability gaps and “uplevel” their operating models—and, in return, gain a 15-percentage-point advantage in performance premium over level two companies.

Finally, level four companies focus on MSPs for strategic advantage—such as innovating the experiences of current customers. These companies enjoy a whopping 43-percentage-point advantage in performance premium over their level two counterparts.

To be sure, being a level four company is no guarantee of being a top performer. But as the chart below shows, it raises the odds hugely: two-thirds of the top-performing companies in our research are using managed services partners at maturity level three (capability gaps) or level four (strategic advantage).

What does level four look like in practice? Consider how Axos Bank turned to a service partner, named Q2 Software, to provide the digital account switching software-as-a-service (SaaS) solution needed to speed up and simplify new account onboarding. This in turn helped Axos achieve higher average customer account balances, while enhancing customer relationships. In this instance, it wasn’t simply a matter of software implementation, but instead an ongoing process enablement that Q2 provided to Axos in one of the bank’s core business processes. For more about how technology and consulting combine to create a new approach to managed services, see sidebar “A new era for managed services.”

In another example of managed services maturity, Eli Lilly became the most valuable standalone pharmaceutical company in the US through a wide-ranging transformation that made speed to market its “number one incentive”—underpinned, in part, by partnerships with contract research organizations and other cloud managed services. Similarly, Moderna achieved strong growth, avoided capital investment, and closed capability gaps by using managed services for manufacturing and distribution. (No doubt they were also fortunate to be in the right place at the right time with their revolutionary mRNA platform.)

Seen from a broader perspective, the leading companies in our research point the way toward a reconception of company boundaries that makes the most of business ecosystem participation on the one hand and managed services partnerships on the other. These companies become more permeable as they provide only a part of an ecosystem’s overall value proposition to customers and let their partners provide the rest.

To support their strategic focus on ecosystems, top companies also open up their operating models, so to speak, by partnering with managed services providers to keep pace with technology changes and close capability gaps (by addressing process, talent, technology, and functional needs)—all of which supports the innovation and speed to market that collectively lead to outperformance.

Making the most of managed services partnerships

Companies looking to join the leaders in the top quintile of performers should begin by figuring out what our PwC colleagues have called their “unique value.” Absent a similar level of strategic clarity, companies may find it difficult to define a coherent and useful approach to managed services partnerships.

Knowing their unique value encourages focus; indeed, the leading companies we studied were 33% more likely to say they focused only on the distinctive activities that matter most to their competitive advantage.

But focus, while crucial, won’t be sufficient. Companies also need to avoid several failure modes relating to organizational culture, high transaction costs (also known as friction or sludge), and the effective use of technology.

Overcoming cultural resistance

Taking a more mature approach to managed services partnerships requires investment, not only in your level of spending (winning companies are 4.2 times more likely to out-invest their peers in managed services), but in your organizational culture. Companies that have a culture characterized by a not-invented-here (NIH) disposition, or by silo syndrome, or by general resistance to change for whatever reason, may struggle to expand their use of MSPs—and thus lack the willingness to trust external partners with crucial elements of their strategic advantage.

How might you recognize an NIH disposition, for example? One indication might be your track record in building new businesses. When was the last time your company started and then scaled a new business to greater than 10 to 20% of your existing revenues? New business building can often be sabotaged by the same “antibodies” and cultural resistance that undermine the more strategic use of MSPs.

If your organizational culture displays some of those tendencies, look for ways to revisit the status quo. You might consider zero-based budgeting, for example, as a forcing device to subject longer-standing fiefdoms or investment areas to more frequent scrutiny—perhaps encouraging them to thereby reconsider which activities they might consider giving to managed services partners. Or you could examine the incentives you provide to your executive team—for instance, by rewarding business units for taking a broader approach to MSPs in support of a clear strategic focus.

Reducing friction

You’ll also want to look at the level of friction in your organization, or what economists call transaction costs. These terms refer to the time and resources needed to do business inside your own organization and with external parties. Companies with high transaction costs can be slow to arrive at consensus, to sign off on decisions, to allocate (and reallocate) budget, or to act on strategic objectives—all of which are impediments to working effectively with managed services partners. According to our research, companies that use these partnerships for strategic advantage are 1.4 times more likely than less mature ones to have lowered their transaction costs.

How much friction is in your business? One way to find out is what author Cass Sunstein calls a “sludge audit,” which can help measure the extent to which paperwork, inconsistent and duplicative requirements and reporting mandates, and muddled governance slow your organization’s decision-making and dynamic resource allocation.

Getting the technology right

There’s an additional point that nearly goes without saying: if you don’t have your technology basics sorted out, chances are you won’t get very far in your effort to get the most from managed services.

It’s a bit circular to assert this, of course, since many companies turn to managed services partners precisely to help with the transformations that they need to keep pace with technology’s rapid advancements. That said, it’s essential to recognize where you are on the transformational journey.

If your company has costly and outdated IT applications, systems, and infrastructure, you may need to address these challenges before you can expect greater speed to market and innovation. If your company doesn’t know an API from a KPI, you may struggle to share data within your organization and beyond. For example, you might miss out on the benefits of using application programming interfaces (APIs) to sit on top of—and help make sense of—outdated IT systems.

Once the basics are sorted out, you can look toward the leading edge—for example, with generative AI. While it’s far more accessible to businesses than its conventional counterpart, generative AI still requires new skills and talent that non-technology companies may struggle to find. Ask yourself how many “prompt engineers” or “model mechanics” you employ, and then make a realistic assessment of your ability to attract them. Good managed services partners should offer an “AI factory” that can help you scale generative AI responsibly and quickly, even as it helps automate and enhance business operations ranging from customer service to software development and data analytics.

No company can go it alone. Winning companies team up with managed services partners to address scarce talent and fast-moving technology—the better to achieve the operating model changes needed to support business model reinvention.