The root of this advice is that a set of fundamental shifts in business factors are expected to create significant distraction over the next 12 months. Ongoing geopolitical and socioeconomic tensions, alongside considerable public policy uncertainty in some countries due to upcoming elections, could make it easy for business leaders to de-prioritise decarbonisation projects.
However, the risks to this reactive approach go beyond the reputational. As this year marks the crystallisation of major regulatory change on multiple fronts, failing to take action on sustainability and net zero will likely create both competitive and legal exposure.
Speaking to Chief Sustainability Officers convened by PwC UK, Peter Hill, COP26 CEO and Senior Advisor to PwC UK said:
“We are entering the era of competitive decarbonisation, where major global players see it as a domestic imperative, and businesses must take the long view on what this means for them. As a few illustrative points, the EU Commission has recently announced its 2040 net greenhouse gas emissions reduction target of 90% compared to 1990 levels, meanwhile, China is on track to meet its 1200 gigawatt wind and solar target six years early, while its storage target of 30 gigawatts is about to be hit two years early. There are similar patterns in the US, most notable with the Inflation Reduction Act. Public pressure is only going to mount in the face of the first year-long world breach of the 1.5°C warming limit. The direction of travel is clear.”
The advice is to pay attention to but not be thrown by the bumper election year, the perceived uncertainty around public policy, and the anti-climate rhetoric that will likely surround the electoral processes taking place in key geographies.
Hill continues: “Net zero and climate are likely to be wedge issues in the US election, with a discernible left-right divide. Some of that sentiment will be seen in UK and EU politics, but the reality is that while some elements may be amended, the legislative and institutional frameworks and economic logic make it very difficult to materially reverse the commitments. Broadly speaking, the momentum around net zero will remain regardless of who is elected, and organisations should galvanise their related plans, as opposed to de-prioritise them.”