Island Index Report 2023

Sustaining prosperity and growth

glass building
  • Publication
  • October 10, 2023

Islands have always played important roles in international trade, communication and innovation, as well as being biodiversity hotspots, and attractive tourist destinations.

In modern times, Jersey, Guernsey, Malta and the Isle of Man have continued this trend by becoming established international financial centres (IFCs), punching above their weight in the global economy as hubs of expertise and conduits of capital. Financial services (FS) and other high value industries have helped the four islands to create quality jobs and living standards, while preserving their strong sense of community and place.

However, the islands are now feeling the effects of faltering productivity growth in financial services since the 2007 - 2008 financial crisis (though this will likely disappear as deleveraging in the sector runs its course). Looking ahead, their economies could be especially vulnerable to the disruptive impacts of climate change, geopolitical instability, technology disruption and ageing populations.

PwC’s new Island Index gauges how prepared Jersey, Guernsey, Malta and the Isle of Man are for the disruptions ahead. We analyse the growth prospects for each of these economies between now and 2050. We conclude by looking at how businesses and governments can address the challenges and opportunities their islands face as they strive to sustain long-term prosperity and growth.

Building on our strong links with communities, businesses and governments, we at PwC are determined to play our part in supporting the islands’ continued success. We hope that this report can provide a useful contribution to understanding and addressing the threats and opportunities ahead.

Steering through global upheaval

The islands’ international finance and business sectors, combined with their tourism and hospitality industries and natural beauty, provide a magnet for investment, talent and high value work.

Many have grown into major centres for specialist services in areas such as investment management, private markets and captive insurance, while continuing to attract thousands of tourists every year. In recent years, the islands have diversified into new growth opportunities such as fintech, sustainable finance and online gaming.

As a result, the job prospects for young people coming into the workforce have been good and unemployment has been low.

Country Island Size
(km²)
Population
(latest Census, 2021)
Population Density
(people per km²)
GDP
2021
GDP per capita 2021
Jersey 120km² 103,267 861 £5,087m £49,260
Guernsey 62km² 63,463 1,024 £3,446m £54,312
Isle of Man 572km² 84,069 147 £5,010m £60,270
Malta 316km² 519,562 1,644 £14,010m £24,489

Slowing global growth

But the future is less certain. Growth in FS is harder won as businesses contend with post-financial crisis deleveraging and regulation1. The continued success of these islands depends on their ability to compete and to maintain relevance on the global stage. Further priorities include strengthening interoperability with the regulatory regimes in key markets, building up their presence in emerging markets and capitalising on opportunities in fast growth/high potential segments such as sustainable finance, while also developing the talent and technology needed to support this.

More broadly, island economies will be affected by what the OECD expects to be a halving of annual global GDP growth in the coming decades (around 3% now to 1.5% by 2060)2. Part of this stems from a deceleration in emerging market growth, but there are also more universal challenges in play, which are the focus for PwC’s ADAPT framework

GDP Growth Projections

Created with Highcharts 9.2.2Annual Growth RateUnited StatesUnited KingdomChinaIndiaOECD AverageEurozone Average2025203020352040204520500%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%
Hover on each country to interact with graph.

Source: OECD (2018), GDP long-term forecast

Uncertain outlook - ADAPT

Inequality could be exacerbated by the squeeze on people on middle incomes as technology and automation polarise the workforce into high skill/high earners and low skill/low earners. The results will eliminate many traditional jobs, reduce consumer spending, corporate returns and tax take and could push many once reasonably well paid and self-supporting people to rely on already stretched welfare.

With the findings from PwC’s latest Net Zero Economy Index revealing that the world needs to decarbonise seven times faster to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels, the need to boost climate resilience and accelerate the green transition is pressing. Decarbonisation also opens up huge opportunities for innovation and growth. Investors have the opportunity to generate long-term returns by providing transition finance. Businesses who act quickly and decisively to decarbonise their operations will benefit from longer-term savings across their supply chains.

In turn, advances in technology in areas such as generative AI have the potential to transform productivity and returns. But before they can do this, they need to win public acceptance and trust.

Ageing populations in China, North America and Europe will lead to a decline in workforce numbers relative to older populations (old-age dependency ratio as defined as the ratio of 65 plus citizens to the working-age population aged 15-64). The results will reduce productive potential, increase care costs and put further strains on public finances.

Moreover, as more and more savings go into paying for retirement and care costs, savings rates will decline, and with them the amount of money available for investment in the economy.

Connectivity, free movement of capital and the rules-based international order have been the hallmarks of globalisation and growth through much of the 21st century. But this favourable environment is now being eroded by geopolitical tensions, the protectionist retreat from globalisation and the move towards ‘friendshoring’ in an increasingly hostile and polarised world.

Declining faith in businesses, markets and governmental institutions can heighten the tensions and polarisation within society, while making it harder to develop the consensus needed to tackle social and economic problems. As trust, order and social cohesion break down, those with internationally attractive skills will increasingly choose to leave, accelerating the downward economic spiral.

Island vulnerabilities and opportunities 

It is against this challenging global backdrop that governments and businesses in Guernsey, Jersey, Malta and the Isle of Man must develop their future strategies and plans. Their hyper-connected economies will be affected by the potential for slowing demand, investment and growth globally. As islands, their distinct demography and geography may also make them especially susceptible to disruptive shifts in areas such as ageing and climate change. At the same time, these islands have always shown a strong capacity for reinvention that could give them an edge in adapting to and taking advantage of disruption and change.

Rising bar for transparency and trust

IFCs operate under heightened international scrutiny. Island governments, regulators and regulated businesses need to demonstrate that they’re setting, enforcing and complying with exceptionally high standards of oversight and control to secure the credibility and trust upon which continued investment depends.

Since the great financial crisis of 2008, these expectations have grown. The FS sector has been subject to increasing regulations - whether related to capital requirements or compliance regulations. This has led to extensive changes in how organisations treat data, handle client onboarding, and anti-money laundering among much else. Anecdotally, the increased time spent on regulatory compliance has largely counteracted the productivity gains achieved from the better use of technology, thereby impacting the profitability and competitiveness of businesses operating in the sector.

Despite these challenges, the OECD ‘white listing’ on transparency, governance and information exchange attests to how Guernsey, Jersey, Malta and the Isle of Man have risen to the challenge and adapted their business environments to changing international expectations.

Looking ahead, the regulatory environment is likely to become more complex - in part due to Brexit. These islands are now operating in a more disjointed regulatory environment where they are seeking to accommodate both EU-wide and UK-specific regulatory expectations, whilst the UK has a diminished voice in shaping EU-wide regulations.

Financial services competition, consolidation and adaptation

Accelerated by the financial crisis of 2008, there has been significant change in how IFCs compete, adapt and co-evolve. Prior to the financial crisis many FS businesses in Guernsey, Jersey, Malta and the Isle of Man were characteristically small and localised. In the intervening years, the previously fragmented industry (particularly in Trust and Company Services Providers - TCSP) has consolidated and internationalised., with some firms having scaled-up and sought corporate listing.

This consolidation has been driven by a number of factors, including the increased cost of business (regulatory entry points), client demands for pan-jurisdictional services, the growth of the funds industry, and new investment from private equity. Together these changes have led to significant M&A activity across the sector. The private banking sector has followed a similar path, with fewer banks operating in some islands than before the financial crisis. This restructure and consolidation of the banking sector has impacted what level of autonomy and influence decision makers in the islands' industries have both locally, and at group level.

The consolidation of the finance industries in these islands both poses opportunities and threats. Their newly found scale means that many of these firms are better able to compete internationally, to meet industry best practices in regulatory compliance, and to invest in their people and technology.

However, it has also had an impact on where decision makers are based as executive management teams are consolidated into single location sites, and some decision-making power shifts across locations and between acquirer and target companies.

This concentration of decision makers is important, though hard to quantify. Whether an island is a net acquirer or net target of these acquisitions and consolidation decisions makes a difference. The heart and mind of a business is where the key decision-making functions are based. With fewer on-island decision makers, the industry could see their roles evolve from being at the heart of the network, to a node in the system. This will have spillover effects on other parts of the industry too, as key decisions on strategy, execution, value creation and talent are made.

Tax shake-up internationally

In turn, the tax landscape is being transformed by international reforms. Key developments include the introduction of ‘Economic substance’ rules and, for the bigger businesses with a turnover of over €750 million, a 15% global minimum corporate tax rate (OECD Pillar 2)3.

The governments of Guernsey, Jersey, Malta and the Isle of Man have endorsed the Pillar 2 reforms as signatories to the Inclusive Framework, although implementation timeframes remain uncertain and the potential tax revenue impact and broader implications for competitiveness are yet to be fully understood.

Move towards net zero

Island states are on the front line of the climate and biodiversity crises. Directly, this includes heightened pressure on critical natural resources like water and soil, and increased vulnerability to storms, floods and rising sea levels. Strengthening food security, supply chains, transport links and energy security are increasingly important for island resilience.

There are also broader implications for islands of the global transition to a net zero and ‘nature positive’ economy. All sectors of the islands’ economies will be affected directly or indirectly. As IFCs, it will be important for continued credibility and competitiveness that the islands lead by example - often framed as the ‘green finance on green islands’ concept.

Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man and Malta have all made clear net zero commitments under the Paris Climate Agreement and are grappling with the challenges of implementation. The feasible pace of change for these islands depends heavily on regulatory change in neighbouring larger economies (e.g. in the EU for low carbon goods), availability of capital investment and skills, and support for the poorest and most vulnerable islanders.

Key on-island traditional sectors such as agriculture, construction and tourism will all need to transform, as can be seen in plans for lower impact tourism in Malta’s Low Carbon Development Strategy4. Islands are already staking a place as both developers and testbeds for green technology. And there are significant economic opportunities arising from better quantifying and leveraging islands’ natural resources, for example in renewable energy generation, blue carbon and marine biodiversity net gain.

Meanwhile, in order to stay relevant as IFCs, the islands will need to keep pace with global regulatory and investor expectations on sustainable finance. They need to protect their industries from sustainability-related financial risks, and ensure equivalence and interoperability of corporate and FS sustainability disclosures. Most importantly, IFCs are ideally placed to take the lead in channelling capital into the transition and capitalising on the innovation and growth this opens up.

The demographic timebomb keeps ticking

And all the time, small island populations are ageing faster than many of their European Union (EU) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Counterparts (OECD), while birth rates are declining. All four islands have a fertility rate significantly below the replacement rate, and even lower than their EU and OECD counterparts. With their constraints on land, housing and natural resources, island states are less able to bring in people to make up for their talent shortfalls.

Created with Highcharts 9.2.2Replacement rateTotal Fertility Rate20142021GuernseyJerseyMaltaIoMEUOECDWorld0123

Source: World Bank, Government of Jersey, States of Guernsey

Practical and political curbs on migration heighten the need to make the most of digitisation, automation and artificial intelligence (AI) to not only overcome labour shortages, but also increase the productivity and value potential of the people in work. Some jobs will be fundamentally transformed or disappear altogether, but new and better ones could emerge, with the green transition coming together with technology to shape many of the workforce developments ahead.

The big question is whether employers and workers are moving fast enough to prepare and adapt, especially as many island businesses may lack the scale to make the necessary investments in transformation. This puts the onus on businesses to pool resources, and on governments to step up support in areas such as the development of digital skills and infrastructure.

Fiscal pressure internally

Public expenditure as a percentage of GDP in these small island economies ranges from the low to mid 20’s as a percentage of GDP. In comparison, the OECD average is between 30-35%5. This in turn constrains the level of public investment these small islands can make into infrastructure, housing, technology, healthcare and education. An ageing population will put further strain on public finances, especially as there could be fewer workers paying tax. There may also be pressure to increase public expenditure to help fund the skills, connectivity and other investments needed to sustain island competitiveness.

Gauging readiness for the future

Our Island Index gauges how prepared Guernsey, Jersey, Malta and the Isle of Man are for the opportunities and challenges ahead. It also looks at each island’s readiness to be part of the new economy by embracing high value, low carbon footprint industries and fostering innovations to benefit from productivity growth.

Building on the ADAPT framework’s analysis of the challenges facing the global economy and their implications, our Island Index hones in on the five dimensions most relevant to the future of island states between now and 2050:

Key indicators include levels of low-lying land and population at risk as a result of climate change. From a policy and strategy perspective, we’ve also analysed carbon emissions, energy dependency and whether or not the island is committed to the Paris Climate Agreement. Measures of progress towards decoupling economic activity from energy-related CO2 emissions are also included.

Key indicators include levels of investment, the development of professional networks and measures of regulatory quality (as determined by international rankings). We’ve also looked at infrastructure development in areas such as wireless connectivity and transport links locally and internationally.

In the face of heightened international scrutiny, the confidence and stability dimension assesses trust, credibility and other external perceptions of the islands. This includes credit ratings, the Financial Action Task Force greylist and international reputation metrics.

In assessing the available talent, skills and motivation needed to drive productivity and economic growth, we’ve drawn on the metrics used in the UN Human Capital Development Index. This includes birth rates (a key determinant of the future workforce size), health, life expectancy, educational attainment, workforce participation and the old-age dependency ratio. We also looked at progress on diversity and inclusion, including developments in the gender pay gap.

This dimension looks at how ready and able governments are to tackle the issues coming up between now and 2050. This includes the effectiveness of government (based on global rankings) and their ability to fund investment as a result of economic growth and taxation. As governments look to build public consensus and bring electorates with them when making difficult decisions, we also look at faith in public bodies (as measured by such indicators as voter turnout), relative inequality and potential marginalisation (as measured by such indicators as housing affordability and the Gini coefficient - a measure of the degree of inequality in the distribution of income/wealth).

Explore the data

The Island Index aims to assess how well small island nations are equipped to deal with global megatrends and ultimately absorb productivity growth. The Island Index score is an unweighted mean of the five themes: Environmental Sustainability, Connectivity & Business Dynamism, Confidence & Stability, Human Capital, and Institutions. Within each of these themes, indicators were converted to a scale of 0 to 100%. The centre of the chart should be read as a score of zero, with the furthest edge of the spoke a score of 100. Therefore, the closer towards the edge of the spoke, the higher the island scores on that theme.

Each of the island charts has a ‘best in theme’ score, highlighting the gap between the island and the leader within that theme. This shows where each island is falling short, relative to their peers. Scores for each of the islands will likely change overtime, as each island adapts to a changing environment and economy.

Improvements across all themes will be important if the islands are to remain competitive and to effectively accelerate technology adoption, build climate resilience, and to adjust to an aged population, amongst other factors.

Island Index

Guernsey

Created with Highcharts 9.2.2EnvironmentalSustainabilityConnectivity & BusinessDynamismConfidence & StabilityHuman CapitalInstitutions5

 Best in theme    

The 'best in theme' composite score is comprised of the highest score achieved in each indicator theme by any of the islands.

Guernsey rates highly on the effectiveness of its institutions in areas such as regulation, integrity and state capacity. But the island could improve its attractiveness to overseas workers by better supporting mobile talent to settle on the island.

Looking at the Human Capital theme more broadly, Guernsey is facing a worsening demographic outlook and the resulting impact on talent availability. The island's age dependency ratio is expected to rise from 55% in 2022 to 72% by 2050, not only heralding potential labour shortages, but also pressure on public finances and services ahead. The States of Guernsey has recently committed to a population growth of 300 people a year for the next decade. While this could help to boost workforce numbers and bridge some of the talent gaps, it may not be enough to offset the continuing increases in the dependency ratio. This highlights the need to encourage older workers to delay what is often quite a young age of retirement and bring in more family-friendly policies for parents who want to return to work.

Guernsey enjoys high levels of confidence and stability, partly driven by high levels of home ownership and low crime rates. But the uncertain outlook in areas such as talent availability could cause some businesses to switch their presence and investment in the island.

Priorities for boosting investment and economic prospects would include a step up in investment in infrastructure and connectivity, both physical and digital.

From a sustainability perspective, whilst Guernsey may have greater exposure to extreme weather events, it does benefit from imported low carbon electricity, and greatly succeeds in one area - household recycling. Guernsey’s recycling rate is said to be one of the highest in the world at 73%11. The island hopes to increase local renewable energy generation and to find affordable ways to implement and finance its net zero transition.

Boosting growth

Guernsey sits at an inflection point. After a period of low population growth coupled with low levels of public investment, policy makers are looking to loosen labour markets and raise investment. Therefore, decisions made in the coming years could greatly change the long-run trajectory of the economy.

Specifically, the proposed capital outlay programme by the States of Guernsey could see a significant uplift in investment locally, creating opportunities to crowd in private investment through the regeneration of key assets - including St Peter Port waterfront (Eastern Seaboard) and the upgrade to the islands energy infrastructure. Further, recent changes in migration policy could see stabilisation and possible moderate growth in the workforce size, further helping to uplift economic growth from its current trajectory.

However, much of the island's future success rests on its appetite to increase investment, accelerate technology adoption, boost human capital and make improvements to connectivity - all of which remains uncertain.

If policy makers are successful at turning the dial from recent trends, the island could see its economic growth levels some way beyond those based on the current policy environment.

“Guernsey is at a crossroads. We can no longer take our economic success, standard of living and quality of life for granted as we come up against the disruptive impact of ageing, climate change and slowing global growth. Our ability to compete depends on investment in skills, connectivity and tech-enabled productivity. We also face some tough decisions on migration, public finances and tax policies as declining workforce numbers not only put growth at risk, but also reduce tax income.”

Evelyn BradyPartner and Guernsey Office Leader, PwC Channel Islands
Evelyn Brady

Islands economic outlook

In addition to gauging the islands’ readiness for disruptive change, we’ve analysed their growth potential in a fast-evolving global economy.

There are many uncertainties about the impact that technological developments will have on the future of productivity. Evidence would suggest that improvements could range from 1-2% per year under a good scenario; however, this depends how well the technologies are diffused. As service based economies, the islands could be well positioned to take advantage of developments, particularly in AI. However, due to the administrative nature of some roles, emerging technologies could, in some cases, replace rather than compliment human activity thus having a downward pressure on productivity. Given the above, we take a conservative view on the long-run impact that these technologies will have on the long-run productivity in the islands.

The central scenario equates to moderate improvements in ‘human capital’14 and tech- and skills-enabled productivity (Total Factor Productivity15). This would be driven by a continuation of existing policies, which have or are being implemented. However, this is subject to changes, for instance any potential shifts in migration policy, government spending or regulations affecting international businesses.

A second scenario looks at growth in line with the OECD average. It’s important to note that each island has a different starting point and policy context. Therefore, growth in line with the OECD average would be an aspirational trajectory for Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man given their high starting point. These islands already enjoy some of the highest levels of GDP per capita in the world. While growing strongly, Malta still has some way to go before it catches up with the GDP per head and affluence of the other three islands.

A third scenario is based on no improvement to productivity, which has been the case for some in recent years. This underlines the imperative need to improve the skills of islanders and productivity of businesses to avoid over dependency on workforce growth.

The shaded projection area represents the projected long-term growth potential under a pro-growth or no-growth environment. Having analysed the policy options and direction within the four islands, there is significant room to influence the growth trajectory in areas such as workforce expansion and the housing and infrastructure to support this.

As economies that are dominated by a small number of sectors (e.g. banking etc.), island GVA can be especially susceptible to short-term movements in areas such as interest rates. The purpose of this report and the evaluations within it is to look beyond short-term economic and political cycles to identify broad long-term trends. We’re not claiming to be able to make precise forecasts of GDP in 2050 – this isn’t possible. But we do believe it is possible to draw out the broad shape of economic developments over this period.

Explore the data

GDP Scenarios

Created with Highcharts 9.2.2GDPNo improvement to productivityBase ScenarioOECD GrowthHistoric GDP2010201520202025203020352040204520502.0B2.5B3.0B3.5B4.0B4.5B5.0B5.5B
Hover over the scenario to interact with graph.

Guernsey’s growth rate and GDP per head are strong by international standards. But sustaining this edge could be difficult in the face of potential labour shortages. Moreover, the island’s favourable economic ratings are heavily dependent on FS. Output per head in other sectors is much lower.

Looking ahead, economic growth looks set to slow over the long-term as a result of low levels of investment and a tight labour market, in turn impacting skills development and productivity improvements.

Boosting workforce capacity and skills is therefore going to be a key priority for the island between now and 2050, especially as any improvements in productivity could be offset by the impact of downward pressures on the workforce. Further investment in technology and skills, and improvements in tech adoption rate, are also going to be important if Guernsey is to maintain living standards and economic potential.

Agenda for action

The small, open and agile economies of Guernsey, Jersey, Malta and the Isle of Man have proved exceptionally adept at adapting to economic developments and attracting capital and talent.

But the challenges of sustaining relevance are mounting. How are investor demands changing? How can the islands keep pace? What can they offer that competitors can’t?

This is also a time of disruption and change. Without concerted action now, factors such as climate change, an ageing society and skills gaps could drag back economic growth and constrain public finances and services.

But with these challenges come opportunities to make the most of each island’s potential, take the lead in areas such as climate action and help younger generations look to the future with renewed confidence.

Drawing on the Island Index and economic projections, we believe there are five key considerations for businesses and governments as they seek to strengthen and sustain relevance, resilience and growth.

Priorities for government

Institutions

Protect and evolve the finance industry

Island IFCs face ever increasing competition from other jurisdictions, tighter scrutiny from global authorities and higher expectations from customers and stakeholders on transparency, accountability and social responsibility. To ensure their finance industries stay relevant and competitive for the long term, governments and regulators need to ensure continued interoperability with major markets, notably the UK, US and EU, maintain regulatory efficiency and agility, and protect their industries from sustainability-related financial risks. They need to facilitate industry upskilling and investment in technology adoption, innovation and sustainable finance. Governments may need to offer incentives to attract new finance businesses to the islands, or support new products, services or emerging markets. Perhaps most importantly, IFCs are ideally placed to take the lead in channelling capital into financing the global sustainability transition and capitalising on the innovation and growth this opens up.

Priorities for businesses

Institutions

Collaborate to compete

Island businesses can often lack the economies of scale within their local operations and markets to drive major investment in technology, upskilling, infrastructure and sustainability. That makes partnership with the government crucial. It also makes the pooling of resources and operational collaboration between sector peers so important. This might be collaborative initiatives in areas such as renewable energy and low-carbon logistics or centralised tech capabilities as part of managed service models. Strong cross sector collaborations and partnerships will be particularly important for the adoption of new technologies that require significant investment and scale, something that island businesses and economies often lack.

Further, island businesses would benefit from looking outwards for growth opportunities, seeking out export opportunities and working with their respective Government to create business environments that support export focused industries.

If you would like to discuss the Island Index ratings and economic projections set out in this report and what they mean for your business or government, please contact the team below.

Methodology

GDP Growth Pathway

This analysis uses a robust long-term economic growth model that accounts for projected trends in demographics, capital investment, education levels and technological progress to estimate potential long-term growth rates:

  • Demographics – specifically growth in the working age population and the weight of an ageing workforce

  • Growth in the quality of labour (‘human capital’) – which is assumed to be related to current and projected average education levels in the workforce

  • Growth in the physical capital stock – which is determined by new capital investment less depreciation of the existing capital stock; and

  • Technological progress – which drives improvements in total factor productivity (TFP)

Market Exchange Rates

All GDP figures are reported as nominal, at the Market Exchange Rate (MER) and are not Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) adjusted. When exchange rates are expected to remain relatively stable, or when reliable data for PPP-adjusted rates is limited, MER can simplify modelling. It finds utility in scenarios where exchange rate fluctuations have a minimal impact on long-term economic variables or in cross-country comparisons over extended periods.

Historical figures for Malta (Euros) have been taken from national accounts and converted at a rate of 0.85987 EUR/GBP which is calculated as the average of average monthly FX rates, sourced from Bloomberg.

The Island Index scores

Scores against the five themes of the Island Index are based on more than 40 indicators and metrics. This analysis has been supported by a broad literature review, encompassing works from key academics as well as working papers from institutions such as the World Bank, OECD, and the European Commission. Primary research from the PwC network has been utilised to gain a unique perspective and offer untapped insights into the economies covered. We discussed the findings with PwC partners from the four islands to harness their local expertise, better understand the wider macroeconomic conditions of their jurisdictions and sense-check the trends and findings emerging from the analysis.

Contact us

Alison Cambray

Alison Cambray

Advisory Director, Sustainability, PwC Channel Islands

Tel: +44 7700 838337

David Valenzia

David Valenzia

Territory Senior Partner, PwC Malta

Tel: +356 2564 6892

Nick Halsall

Nick Halsall

Territory Senior Partner, PwC Isle of Man

Tel: +44 (0) 1624 689680

Leyla Yildirim

Leyla Yildirim

Chief Strategy Officer, PwC Channel Islands

Tel: +44 7781 161874

James Linder

James Linder

Advisory Senior Manager, PwC Channel Islands

Tel: +44 7797 735561

Lewis Cameron

Lewis Cameron

Advisory Associate, PwC Channel Islands

Follow us