
Minimum standards for parts of the international tax system were agreed under the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) Action Plan as part of recommendations published in October 2015. The BEPS Inclusive Framework (IF) comprises around 130 countries committed to implementing those minimum standards – see the list of IF members on the OECD website (PDF)Opens in a new window. Alongside the minimum standards, which applied to elements of four of the fifteen action items, there were identified a number of best practices and areas for greater alignment.
The BEPS Project had been initiated by the G20 countries but it effectively also encompassed the other OECD Member States from the outset. As the project progressed, engagement in the discussions was extended to other large non-OECD states and representatives of developing countries. PwC submitted a large number of responses in relation to the various BEPS proposals put forward action by action. The OECD published over 1600 pages in the ‘final’ reports in relation to all 15 BEPS Action items in October 2015Opens in a new window and the wider range of IF countries became individually involved.
BEPS Action Plan: Action 1 - The digital economy |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 2 - Hybrid mismatch arrangements |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 3 - Controlled foreign companies (CFC) regimes |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 4 - Financial payments |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 5 - Harmful tax practices |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 6 -
|
BEPS Action Plan: Action 7 - Permanent establishment (PE) status |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 8 - Transfer pricing and intangibles |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 9 - Transfer pricing and risks/ capital |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 10 - Transfer pricing and other high-risk transactions |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 11 - Data and methodologies |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 12 - Disclosure of aggressive tax planning |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 13 - Transfer pricing documentation |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 14 - Dispute resolution mechanisms |
BEPS Action Plan: Action 15 - A multilateral instrument |
It may take some while for the impact of these recommendations to be fully applied in practice, but the BEPS Project and related developments are constantly leading to the need for business to take action (in some cases, urgent action) both to comply with new requirements and to consider the ways in which they do business in different countries.
The OECD BEPS project recommended that the presence of a permanent establishment (PE) required under most double tax treaties to give taxing rights to a host country should be determined by taking into account certain activities in that country of related businesses.
The OECD on February 11 issued its final paper on the transfer pricing aspects of financial transactions (the OECD FT Paper), which will become Chapter X of the OECD Guidelines.
Governments, businesses, and civil society have long sought analysis of the potential economic and revenue effects of the Pillar One and Pillar Two proposals.
The OECD published a consultation document Review of Country-by-Country Reporting (BEPS Action 13) on 6 February 2020 and launched a public consultation that will end on 6 March 2020, to be followed by a public hearing on 17 March 2020.
The Inclusive Framework – comprised of nearly 140 jurisdictions – has been seeking a solution to the tax challenges arising from digitalisation of the economy.
PwC International Ltd on behalf of its network of member firms (“PwC”) welcomes the opportunity to share its views in reaction to the OECD Secretariat’s Consultation Document (“CD”) on Pillar Two of the Work Programme on the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy (together with Pillar One, “the Project”).
PwC International Ltd (PwC) welcomes the opportunity to share its views in reaction to the OECD secretariat’s consultation paper on the unified approach under Pillar 1 of the Work Programme on the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy.
PwC’s Comments on the Draft Toolkit designed to help developing countries with the implementation of transfer pricing documentation requirements
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Secretariat on 8 November, published Public consultation document: Global Anti-Base Erosion Proposal (‘GloBE’) (Pillar Two) (‘the Consultation’) which seeks stakeholders’ views on the introduction of common global minimum tax rules across the more than...
On 9 October, the Secretariat of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published Secretariat Proposal for a “Unified Approach” under Pillar One (the “Pillar 1 Unified Approach”) that, if ultimately agreed, would fundamentally alter the international tax regime.
The OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative and the EU's cross-border tax arrangements directive, DAC6, both strive for transparency, fairness and integrity in the global tax ecosystem. However, they differ significantly from each other especially when it comes to reporting and sanctions. Watch here...
Public Consultation Document: What is Driving Tax Morale?
PwC response to OECD consultation on digital March 2019.
The EU Council Directive 2011/16 in relation to cross-border tax arrangements, known as DAC6, has been in force since 25 June 2018. DAC6 aims for transparency.
Hear transfer pricing partners discuss the current state of country-by-country reporting as well as documentation.
Edwin Visser
Deputy Global Tax Policy Leader, EMEA Tax Policy Leader, PwC Netherlands
Tel: +31 88 792 3611