
This is a publication about developments in Philippine taxation. The contents usually include latest Republic Acts, Bureau of Internal Revenue issuances, Customs regulations, Court decisions, BSP circulars, SEC circulars, Department of Justice opinions and Executive Orders relevant to Tax practice.
Talk to us
For further discussion on the contents of this issue of the Client Advisory Letter, please contact any of our partners.
Request for copies of text
You may ask for the full text of the Client Advisory Letter by writing our Tax Department, Isla Lipana & Co., 29th Floor, Philamlife Tower, 8767 Paseo de Roxas, 1226 Makati City, Philippines. T: +63 (2) 8845 2728. F: +63 (2) 8845 2806.
Analysis by PwC of over 1000 published reports from listed, private and public sector organisations, highlights that with only ten years to deliver the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there is a great deal of work to be done if business is to contribute meaningfully to national efforts.
PwC’s annual assessment of public reporting on the SDGs assesses the level of integration of the goals into leadership, business strategy and reporting, as an indicator of business’ vital contribution to achieving Government’s stated commitments within the next ten years.
Nearly three quarters (72%) of organizations analyzed reference the goals in their public reporting, just over half in their annual report. Only 1% of the overall sample report quantitative measures to show their progress towards those targets.
It’s now four years since the Sustainable Development Goals were unanimously ratified by all 193 UN Members states as a universal framework for more sustainable ways of living and operating. While Governments around the world have the ultimate responsibility for delivering on the goals, they cannot be achieved without the support of business.
Progress requires specific reporting
Despite good overall awareness, progress on the SDGs could be undermined by a lack of specifics on targets, measurement, and wider business integration. Reporting progress towards the targets needed to achieve the ambitions is very immature, despite the goals offering a common language and framework to build a more transparent view of the issues, progress and scale of change needed. Just 1% of companies analyzed measure their performance against specific SDG targets.
Of the companies analyzed:
Louise Scott, global lead on Sustainable Development Goals, PwC, says:
“While awareness is high, unless integrated measurement and reporting takes place, progress and relevant policy measures can’t be identified at the level of detail necessary to really drive progress on reaching the goals.”
“Companies are starting to prioritise goals they believe are relevant to them, but we’ve little evidence of joined up thinking on how the goals are approached. Goals related to water, land and energy have strategic opportunities and risks for almost every sector, yet are not widely identified as considerations in future business strategies and investments.”
“The goals are practical. They are both a risk and opportunity management framework from businesses’ point of view. While companies don’t need to specifically reference goals to be acting on them, we should be seeing the identification of issues that underpin them and strategies to address them, and unfortunately we’re not.”
Read the full report here.
Establishment of an agent constitutes doing business in the Philippines
In order to qualify for VAT zero rating under Section 108(B)(2) of the Tax Code, the taxpayer must show that its client is a foreign corporation not engaged in business in the Philippines.
A foreign corporation is considered engaged in business if it propagates products in the Philippines and actively participates in several phases of the distribution process. Further, the establishment of a local agent in the Philippines constitutes doing business in the Philippines. Hence, the sale of services to such foreign corporation does not qualify for the VAT zero rate.
(CTA EB No. 1838, promulgated 26 November 2019)
In a collection case, the CTA may review the validity of an assessment
When reviewing the issuance of a warrant of distraint and/or levy by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the CTA’s jurisdiction is not limited to a review of the collection procedure subsequent to the assessment.
The CTA may also review the validity or invalidity of an assessment to determine whether the right of the government to assess and collect taxes already prescribed.
(CTA EB No. 1979, promulgated 26 November 2019)
New wording and format of the BIR Notice to the Public
All persons required to issue official receipts and/or sales invoices are directed to post in their places of business, including their branches and mobile stores, the new BIR Notice to the Public. The specific wording and format of the new BIR Notice to the Public are provided under RR No. 10-2019.
(Revenue Regulations No. 10-2019, published on 3 & 13 December 2019)
Application for Contractor’s Final Payment Release Certificate no longer required
Since a tax clearance already serves as proof of the full and timely payment of taxes and is a mandatory requirement for the procurement of infrastructure projects, the BIR does not anymore require the filing/submission of an Application for Contractor’s Final Payment Release Certificate (BIR Form No. 0217).
Accordingly, the provision in RMO No. 12-2015 requiring the filing of BIR Form No. 0217 and the presentation thereof by the BIR to the Department of Public Works and Highways as a requirement for the release of the contractor’s final payment has been revoked and shall no longer be enforced.
(Revenue Memorandum Order No. 57-2019, issued 2 December 2019)
Taxpayers and Top Withholding Agents not required to withhold the 1% and 2% EWT
Under RR No. 7-2019, top withholding agents (TWAs) refer to taxpayers whose gross sales/receipts or pross purchases or claimed deductible itemized expenses amounted to PH₱12m during the preceding taxable year. TWAs are required to withhold 1% and 2% EWT from their income payments to local suppliers of goods and services, respectively, who are not covered by specific EWT rates.
However, Operations Memorandum (OM) Order No. 20-2019 excludes the following in the identification of TWAs even if they have satisfied the criteria under RR No. 7-2019:
Accordingly, the following cannot be compelled to withhold the 1% and 2% EWT under Section 2.57.2(I) of RR No. 2-1998 despite their inclusion in the published list of TWAs:
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 143-2019, issued 27 December 2019)
Basic requirements for the execution of waivers of the defense of prescription
The BIR reiterated the following salient points with respect to the proper execution of waivers of the defense of prescription and the basic requirements thereof:
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 141-2019, issued 20 December 2019)
How to recover erroneously deducted DST under the eDST system
Taxpayers-users of the Electronic Documentary Stamp Tax (eDST) System with erroneously deducted DST amounts from their ledger balances may recover the same by filing a request for adjustment if the following are satisfied:
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 142-2019, issued 27 December 2019)
Revision of BIR Form Nos. 1601-EQ and 1602Q
The following have been revised in light of the TRAIN law:
The revised manual returns are already available in the BIR website. However, they are not yet available in the Electronic Filing and Payment System (eFPS) and Electronic Bureau of Internal Revenue Forms (eBIRForms). Accordingly, eFPS and eBIRForm taxpayers shall continue using the existing versions in the eFPS and eBIRForms Package v7.5, respectively, in filing and remitting taxes due thereon.
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 139-2019, issued 20 December 2019)
Publishing the list of additional withholding agents
The BIR has circularized the recently published lists of additional withholding agents for inclusion to and deletion from the list of withholding agents required to deduct and remit the 1% and 2% creditable withholding taxes (CWT) prescribed under Section 2.57.2(I) of
RR No. 2-1998. The obligation to deduct and remit shall continue, commence or cease effective 1 January 2020.
Taxpayers not included in the updated list of withholding agents are deemed excluded and therefore, are not required to deduct and remit the 1% and 2% CWT.
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 136-2019, issued 16 December 2019)
Pointers to consider in availing the tax amnesty on delinquencies
The BIR has reiterated the following in connection with the availment of the tax amnesty on delinquencies:
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 135-2019, issued 11 December 2019)
Newly-revised BIR Form No. 1702-EX
The BIR has revised BIR Form No. 1702-EX (Annual Income Tax Return for Corporation, Partnership and Other Non-Individual Taxpayer Exempt Under the Tax Code). This includes both the Optional Standard Deduction and itemized deductions which are available to be claimed by General Professional Partnerships.
The revised manual return is already available in the BIR website. However, it is not yet available in the Electronic Filing and Payment System (eFPS). Accordingly, eFPS taxpayers shall use the Offline eBIRForms Package v7.5 in filing the return.
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 134-2019, issued 5 December 2019)
Revised People's Freedom of Information Manual
The BIR released the Revised People’s Freedom of Information (FOI) Manual of the BIR, including the following annexes:
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 128-2019, issued 29 November 2019)
Providing a new tax type code under the estate tax amnesty
The BIR has provided a new tax type code for the acceptance payment form 0621-EA Estate Tax Amnesty as follows:
BIR Form No. |
Form Description |
Tax Type |
Tax Type Description |
ATC |
0621-EA |
Acceptance Payment Form Estate Tax Amnesty |
ES |
Estate Tax |
MC320 |
Accordingly, all Authorized Agent Banks are advised to accept BIR Form No. 0621-EA (September 2019 version) with its corresponding tax type as the payment form for the Estate Tax Amnesty.
(Bank Bulletin No. 2019-24, dated 9 December 2019)