
This is a publication about developments in Philippine taxation. The contents usually include latest Republic Acts, Bureau of Internal Revenue issuances, Customs regulations, Court decisions, BSP circulars, SEC circulars, Department of Justice opinions and Executive Orders relevant to Tax practice.
Talk to us
For further discussion on the contents of this issue of the Client Advisory Letter, please contact any of our partners.
Request for copies of text
You may ask for the full text of the Client Advisory Letter by writing our Tax Department, Isla Lipana & Co., 29th Floor, Philamlife Tower, 8767 Paseo de Roxas, 1226 Makati City, Philippines. T: +63 (2) 8845 2728. F: +63 (2) 8845 2806.
In 2007, a business process outsourcing company registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) as an Ecozone IT (Export) Enterprise under the income tax holiday (ITH) regime derived foreign exchange (forex) gains from its hedging contract with a bank.
Through the hedging contract, the company used its earned United States Dollars (USD) to purchase Philippine Pesos (“Pesos”) on pre-determined dates and exchange rates in order to pay local business expenses.
After the declaring the forex gains in its income tax return and paying income tax thereon, the company filed a claim for refund of said income taxes. According to the company, since its PEZA-registered activity is the establishment of a contact center, forex gains derived under the hedging contract which is related to the contact center is covered by the ITH. Further, the activity that led to the forex gain involved the sale of USD earned through the contact center and the purchase of Pesos needed to pay operational expenses.
The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) denied the claim because even though the earned USD was being used to purchase Pesos for purposes of paying the company’s ordinary and necessary expenses, the fact still remained that the forex gains were derived from the hedging contract with the bank and not from the registered activity as a contact center.
However, the Supreme Court (SC) reversed the CTA decision. The SC granted the claim for refund and ruled that hedging is considered very much related to the registered activity of the company, hence, is also subject to the ITH. It pointed out that the secondary purpose in the company’s Articles of Incorporation authorizes the latter to enter into a hedging contract to protect against devaluation in terms of local currency.
(GR No. 216601, promulgated 7 October 2019)
For capital gains tax purposes, the Secretary of Finance has discarded the use of the Adjusted Net Asset Method (which adjusts assets and liabilities to fair market values) in determining the fair market value (FMV) of unlisted shares sold, exchange or bartered.
The new rules in determining the FMV of shares are as follows:
Shares |
Prima facie FMV or FMV |
Common shares |
Book value based on the latest available financial statements (AFS) duly certified by an independent public accountant prior to the date of sale, but not earlier than the immediately preceding taxable year |
Preferred shares |
Liquidation value - which is equal to the redemption price of the preferred shares as of balance sheet date nearest to the transaction date, including any premium and cumulative preferred dividends in arrears |
Common shares (when there are also preferred shares) |
Book value computed by deducting the liquidation value of the preferred shares from the total equity of the corporation and then dividing the result by the number of outstanding common shares as of balance sheet date nearest to the transaction date |
Significantly, the book value of common shares or the liquidation value of the preferred shares of stock does not anymore need to be adjusted to include any appraisal surplus from any property of the corporation not reflected or included in the latest AFS. In other words, the latest AFS shall be sufficient in determining the FMV of the shares.
(Revenue Regulations No. 20-2020, published 19 August 2020)
Republic Act No. 11439 entitled “An Act Providing for the Regulation and Organization of Islamic Banks” mandates neutral tax treatment between Islamic and equivalent conventional banking transactions. Pursuant to this mandate, the Secretary of Finance issued implementing regulations which provide for the following:
(Revenue Regulations No. 17-2020, published 8 August 2020)
The BIR issued the following guidelines and requirements to address unplanned tax implications and burdens with respect to alien employees of foreign corporations whose stay in the Philippines was prolonged as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic:
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 83-2020, issued 17 August 2020)
The eAFS System is now available not only for the submission of attachments to the 2019 annual income tax return (ITR) but also for the submission of:
Document group and file name |
Manually filed |
Electronically filed |
|
File 1 EAFS[TIN]ITRTYMMYYY |
• ITR • Proof of payment
|
|
|
File 2
|
|
||
File 3
|
|
Document group and file name |
Manually filed |
Electronically filed |
File 1 EAFS[TIN]ITR#QMMYYY |
Quarterly ITR (BIR Form No. 1701Q or 1702Q |
Filing Reference Number / Email confirmation |
File 3 EAFS[TIN]OTH#QMMYYYY-01
File size should not exceed 4.8GB
In case of additional file:
File 4 EAFS[TIN] OTH#QMMYYYY-02
Where “#” is the Taxable Quarter |
|
Notwithstanding the electronic submission, taxpayers must keep the original copies in accordance with Section 203 of the Tax Code for the period prescribed under Revenue Regulations No. 17-2013.
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 82-2020, issued 11 August 2020)
In light of the Modified Enhanced Community Quarantine (MECQ) in the NCR, Bulacan, Cavite, Laguna and Rizal from 4 August to 18 August, taxpayers under the jurisdiction of Revenue District Office (RDO) Nos. 24 to 34 and 38 to 57 have the following tax filing/payment options:
Accordingly, AABs are mandated to:
(Revenue Memorandum Circular Nos. 80-2020 and 79-2020, issued 6 and 5 August 2020; and Bank Bulletin Nos. 12-2020 and 11-2020, dated 6 and 5 August 2020)
In light of the Modified Enhanced Community Quarantine (MECQ) in Metro Cebu, taxpayers under the jurisdiction of Revenue Region No. 13 – Cebu City have the following tax filing/payment options:
The foregoing is effective until the MECQ is lifted and when Metro Cebu has been placed under General Community Quarantine (GCQ).
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 78-2020, issued 30 July 2020)
In light of problems encountered by taxpayers within the jurisdiction of Revenue Region (RR) No. 8A, all authorized agent banks (AABs) under RR No. 8A are requested to accept all tax returns/payments of taxpayers from Revenue District Office Nos. 47 – East Makati, 48 – West Makati, 49 – North Makati and 50 – South Makati.
(Bank Bulletin No. 10-2020, 10 July issued 2020)