Client Advisory Letter (November-December 2018)
This is a publication about developments in Philippine taxation. The contents usually include latest Republic Acts, Bureau of Internal Revenue issuances, Customs regulations, Court decisions, BSP circulars, SEC circulars, Department of Justice opinions and Executive Orders relevant to Tax practice.
Talk to us
For further discussion on the contents of this issue of the Client Advisory Letter, please contact any of our partners.
Request for copies of text
You may ask for the full text of the Client Advisory Letter by writing our Tax Department, Isla Lipana & Co., 29th Floor, Philamlife Tower, 8767 Paseo de Roxas, 1226 Makati City, Philippines. T: +63 (2) 845 2728. F: +63 (2) 845 2806.
Cover photo: Mother and daughter, Former Chairman and Senior Partner Tammy Lipana and Deals and Corporate Finance Director Kate Lipana-Gomez
Disclosure of the expected impact of IFRS/PFRS 16 Leases
At a glance
IFRS/PFRS 16, the new accounting standard for leases, becomes effective for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2019. As with other new accounting standards, IFRS/PFRS reporters are required to disclose information relevant to assessing the impact of IFRS/PFRS 16 in periods prior to adoption.
The 2018 annual reporting period is the final reporting period prior to the mandatory adoption of IFRS/PFRS 16; and, by the time that companies publish their 2018 annual reports, they will have implemented IFRS/PFRS 16.
What is the issue?
Paragraphs 30 and 31 of IAS/PAS 8, ‘Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors’, detail the disclosure requirements for the expected impact of new accounting standards which have not yet been adopted. In particular, IAS/PAS 8 requires entities to disclose known or reasonably estimable information relevant to assessing the possible impact that application of IFRS/PFRS 16 will have on an entity’s financial statements in the period of initial application.
It is therefore important that entities carefully consider the expected impact of IFRS/PFRS 16, to provide specific and meaningful disclosure.
What is the impact and for whom?
Practical suggestions for robust disclosure of the impact of IFRS/PFRS 16
All entities with leases, or arrangements where significant judgement has been made in assessing whether it contains a lease, will need to consider their disclosure of the expected impact of IFRS/PFRS 16. Entities without leases should consider disclosing the fact that IFRS/PFRS 16 is not expected to impact them.
With reference to the requirements of IAS/PAS 8, we set out below our practical suggestions of matters for entities to consider disclosing in relation to the expected impact of IFRS/PFRS 16.These practical suggestions are solely an indicative guide of how an entity could respond to the need to disclose the impact of IFRS/PFRS 16. Disclosures should be entity-specific, and each entity should consider what disclosures best meet the requirements of IAS/PAS 8 and regulator expectations, based on their specific facts and circumstances.
- Disclose the fact that IFRS/PFRS 16: Leases has not yet been applied, that it is applicable for annual reporting periods commencing 1 January 2019, and the date on which the entity expects to first apply IFRS/PFRS 16.
- Information about the structure and status of the entity’s implementation project.
- A description of the changes in accounting policy which will take effect, including whether exemptions will be applied (such as low-value or short-term exemptions).
- A description of which transition approach will be taken, and whether any practical expedients will be applied.
- A description of the key judgements and estimates made (such as assessing whether an arrangement contains a lease, determining the lease term, calculating the discount rate and whether any service/lease components of arrangements will be separated), and identifying lease portfolios for which IFRS/PFRS 16 has a significant impact.
- Quantification of the expected impact (restatement to assets, liabilities and retained earnings/opening retained earnings adjustment, or the change in assets, liabilities, income, expense on adoption, depending on transition approach).
- If taking the simplified transition approach, an explanation of any differences between the current operating lease commitment disclosure and IFRS/PFRS 16 lease liability balances, and a statement that lease liability comparative information has not been restated.
When does it apply?
IFRS/PFRS 16 applies for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. Therefore there is an expectation, as explained above, that disclosures within the 2018 annual reports will sufficiently explain the expected impact of IFRS/PFRS 16, particularly given that 2018 annual reports will be released during 2019, after IFRS/ PFRS 16 has been adopted.
Global economic growth expected to slow in 2019
The global economy as a whole is expected to slow in 2019 as G7 countries return to long-run average growth rates, according to new projections from PwC in its latest Global Economy Watch.
PwC expects that the pick-up in growth of most major economies seen between the end of 2016 and the beginning of 2018 is now over. In the US, the boost from fiscal stimulus is expected to fade, higher interest rates are likely to dampen consumer spending and a strong dollar will continue to drag on net exports. PwC projects US growth will moderate from an estimated 2.8% in 2018 to around 2.3% in 2019.
Barret Kupelian, senior economist at PwC, said: “Last year, the big economic news was centered around advanced economies creating around 4.5 million jobs. We expect this trend to gradually moderate in 2019 with some economies like the US, Canada and Germany hitting structural floors in their unemployment rates, and wage growth starting to gradually pick up. Assuming an orderly Brexit, we expect the UK to also see unemployment flattening off, though a disorderly Brexit could lead to a marked rise of unemployment.” The full predictions piece is available to read here pwc.com/GEW
Taxes, compliance matters, assessments, and refunds
Spirit of giving
Donation incidental to the dissolution of the absolute community of property
A regional trial court annulled the marriage between two spouses and approved the Agreement for Custody and Support and Liquidation, Dissolution, and Separation of the Property Regime (Agreement). The Agreement provided for the donation of a condominium unit to their child. Accordingly, the spouses executed the donation and paid donor’s taxes. Subsequently, the former spouses applied for a refund of the donor’s taxes because:
a. there was no donative intent on their part given that thedonation was merely premised upon their compliance with the legal requirements for the dissolution of property relations, and
b. the transfer of property is a legal consequence of the dissolution of the absolute community.
The CTA denied the refund claim ruling that there was donative intent when the spouses gave their property to their child without consideration. Further, although the Family Code mandates the delivery of the presumptive legitime to the child upon dissolution and partition of the absolute community, ownership was not transferred to the child by operation of law. It was transferred when the spouses executed the donation in compliance with the law.
(CTA Case No. 9765, promulgated 23 November 2018)
More control is tax-free
The CTA En Banc affirmed the tax-free treatment of share swap for further control
In a share swap agreement, the taxpayers’ shareholding in the retail company increased from 66.55% to 75.83%. Prior to the share swap, the taxpayers already collectively owned more than majority of the outstanding capital stock of the retail company. The taxpayers treated the share swap as tax-free exchange under Sections 40(C)(2) and (6)(c) of the Tax Code. The tax office opposed the treatment on the basis that the taxpayers failed to secure the required application for a tax-free exchange certification from the BIR.
The CTA En Banc upheld the decision of the CTA Division which ruled that the share swap transaction qualifies for tax-free exchange treatment under Sections 40(C)(2) and (6)(c) of the Tax Code. The CTA reiterated that a BIR ruling is not a prerequisite for the tax-free exchange treatment. Under the law, no gain or loss shall be recognized if the property is transferred to a corporation by a person in exchange for stock in such a corporation of which, as a result of such exchange said person, alone or together with others, not exceeding four persons, gains control of said corporation. In this case, the control requirement is sufficiently met when after the transfer, the taxpayers further increased their equity to more than 51% of the total voting power in the transferee corporation. Consequently, the transferor will not be subject to CGT, income tax or creditable withholding tax on the transfer of such property.
(CTA EB No. 1522 dated 28 February 2018)
Issue with authority
Who can sue in behalf of a local government unit
The City Treasurer of Tagum City is not authorized by the Local Government Code or by the city charter to file a judicial suit for or on behalf of Tagum City. Thus, a prior Sangguniang Panglungsod resolution is necessary to authorize the City Treasurer to file a suit.
(CTA AC No. 190 [UDK-SP 015], promulgated 14 November 2018)
Franchise player
Imposition of the franchise tax on a transmission company
The franchise tax under the Local Government Code is imposed on the privilege of operating a franchise. Since it partakes the nature of an excise tax, the situs of the franchise tax is the place where the privilege is exercised. The CTA ruled that a city cannot impose franchise tax on a transmission company because the latter does not operate and have a principal office in said city. Also, the imposition cannot be justified by the fact that the transmission company has a customer with an office in the city.
(CTA AC No. 190 [UDK-SP 015], promulgated 14 November 2018)
CTA divisions
Mandatory issuance of a new LOA when reassigning a tax investigation
According to the CTA First Division, a reassignment of tax investigation cases requires the issuance of a new LOA. Hence, the issuance of a Memorandum of Assignment instead of a new LOA renders an assessment void. Note: In an earlier decision* by the CTA Second Division, the latter held the view that although RMO 43-1990 requires the issuance of a new LOA in the event of a transfer or reassignment to new tax examiners, the CIR or his/her duly authorized representative has the prerogative to modify or amend the existing LOA instead of issuing a new one – in order for the assessment to validly proceed.
(CTA Case No. 9168, promulgated 8 November 2018)
* CTA Case No. 9179, promulgated 2 August 2018.
Misplaced presumption
When PILAA cannot be used in assessing local business taxes
Balanga City assessed local business taxes using the Presumptive Income Level Assessment (PILAA) despite the taxpayer’s submission of sworn certifications of gross sales or receipts for the preceding calendar years. The taxpayers paid under protest and subsequently filed a refund claim.
The CTA granted the refund. Pursuant to Section 2M.04(d) of the Balanga City Revenue Code, the sworn declaration of gross sales and/or receipts should have been used in computing the local business tax due. Best available evidence or the PILAA may be resorted to only if the taxpayer failed to provide said sworn declaration on account of its failure to maintain books of accounts and records.
(CTA AC No. 200, promulgated 22 October 2018)
Wider acceptance
Revenue District Offices are already allowed to accept ONETT-related tax payments
Revenue Collection Officers (RCOs) assigned in RDOs are now allowed to accept tax payments pertaining to One-Time Transactions (ONETT) such as payments of CGT, DST, donor’s tax, estate tax and other ONETT-related taxes.
Payments for ONETT-related taxes amounting to PHP20,000 and below shall be in cash; while those above PHP20,000 shall be made through Manager’s or Cashier’s Checks to the RCO.
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 107-2018 issued 28 December 2018; Revenue Memorandum Order No. 49-2018 issued 13 November 2018)
Simple cases
Clarifying the instances when a TVN may be issued
TVN shall cover the verification of the following cases:
- Estate tax cases where the decedent has no other tax liabilities;
- Claims for tax refund
a. VAT refund pursuant to Section 112 of the Tax Code,
b. Claims of Job Order personnel, orc. Claims arising from erroneous/double payment of taxes, including double payment due to system error/glitch.
The TVN shall be signed the Head of Office authorized to process the estate tax return/claim for tax refund, and shall be manually issued until the TVN system is in place.
(Revenue Memorandum Order No. 48-2018 issued 5 November 2018)
Status quo ante
Deleting the provisions regarding taxation of group health insurance premiums
In June 2018, RMC 50-2018 was issued to address frequently asked questions in relation to the income tax and withholding tax provisions of the TRAIN Act.
The BIR has amended said RMC by deleting the following questions and answers that were not affected by the TRAIN Act:
- Q7/A7 – group health insurance premiums
- Q34/A34 – directors fees
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 96-2018 issued 29 November 2018
New package
Availability of the updated eBIRForms Package Version 7.2
The offline eBIRForms Package Version 7.2 is now available and downloadable from the following sites:
- www.bir.gov.ph; and
- www.knowyourtaxes.ph
The package includes the following revised BIR forms:
| BIR Form No. | Form Name |
| 1601C | Monthly Remittance Return of Income Taxes Withheld on Compensation |
| 1602Q | Quarterly Remittance Return of Final Taxes Withheld on Interest Paid on Deposits and Deposit Substitutes/Trusts/Etc. |
| 1603Q | Quarterly Remittance Return of Final Income Taxes Withheld on Fringe Benefits Paid to Employees Other Than Rank and File |
| 2551Q | Quarterly Percentage Tax Return |
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 93-2018 issued 5 November 2018)
Micro-management
Clarifying the tax returns to be used by Microfinance NGOs
The BIR has clarified the forms to be used by duly registered and accredited Microfinance Non-Government Organizations (MF-NGOs) in the filing and payment of the 2% tax based on gross receipts in lieu of all national taxes.
The clarifications distinguish the forms to be used by MFNGOs with purely microfinance operations and MF-NGOs with income from non-microfinance operations.
(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 92-2018 dated 31 October 2018)
Related Content
Follow PwC Philippines
