What is the cost of fraud?
What is the cost of fraud?
31% of respondents reporting losses of over $100 thousand from the most disruptive fraud and 12% among them pointed the losses of between $1 million and $50 million.
Damage from fraud goes far beyond financial losses. Ukrainian organisations reported that reputation/ brand strength (50%), business relations (42%) and relations with regulators (38%) suffered significantly from economic crimes.
58% of Ukrainian respondents described employee morale as being damaged by the most serious fraud.
Who is the main perpetrator?
Who is the main perpetrator?
This year’s survey revealed a significant increase (+28% to 56%) in the share of economic crime committed by internal actors. There was also a jump in the percentage of those crimes attributed to senior management (from 27% in 2016 to 55% in 2018).
67% of external perpetrators (responsible for 36% of fraud) are “frenemies” of the organisation – people the organisation works with, including agents, vendors and customers.
How organisations prevent fraud?
How organisations prevent fraud?
Despite the increase in spending, many Ukrainian organisations are still addressing fraud prevention using a reactive, defensive approach.
Only 40% of organisations in Ukraine said they had conducted a general fraud risk assessment in the past two years. Almost every fifth organisation (17%) had not performed any risk assessment at all in the past two years.
Additionally, the percentage of respondents who indicated they have a formal business ethics and compliance programme has dropped from 75% to 59%.