{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
Since the end of July 2023, when the Fed, FDIC, and OCC released their long-awaited proposal to implement the final components of the Basel III agreement, also known as Basel III endgame, banks and other interested parties have been actively assessing its impact on all four categories of banks in the Fed’s regulatory tailoring framework.
A primary area of focus for this assessment has been the proposal’s impact on operational risk capital. The proposal replaces the current internal models based approach (i.e. the advanced measurement approach) with a new standardized measurement approach (SMA) for assessing operational risk capital that is only partially aligned to the global Basel framework and implementations in other jurisdictions.1
This scrutiny has been recently bolstered by in-depth analysis of member data from ORX, the financial services operational risk management association. While there are numerous contributing aspects of the proposed changes, there are several increasingly clear implications of the Basel III endgame proposal:
With the regulators having recently extended the comment period for the proposal until January 16, 2024, it is likely that banks will further push for adjustments to the operational risk formulations, particularly as the regulators have not provided detailed rationale for these implications.
In this Our Take Special Edition, we will explain the components of operational risk RWA calculation and the data from ORX supporting these implications.
1. Under the current U.S. proposal, banks will be required to calculate their RWA under the SA and what the proposal describes as the “expanded risk-based approach,” which includes the new operational risk SMA. Banks would be bound by the higher of the two approaches.