
The building blocks for net zero transformation
PwC has defined an ESG framework with nine building blocks for a successful net zero transformation and decarbonization strategy across your business.
Click on any major news site and you’ll probably encounter headlines about companies scaling back — or even dropping — their sustainability initiatives. These headlines create the impression that corporate sustainability efforts are buckling under unrelenting economic, political and regulatory pressures. But look closer — you will find a different reality, one that’s been quietly unfolding behind the scenes.
PwC’s 2025 State of Decarbonization report shows there remains a strong commitment to sustainability as a source of business value. Companies may be talking less about their climate pledges, but most are focused on addressing rising energy demands, protecting value at risk, responding to evolving customer expectations and designing their operations to secure long-term growth and resilience.
Of note:
We used GenAI to analyze more than one million entries of long form free text responses along with quantitative responses from 4,163 companies. Unlike reports that measure decarbonization against scientific targets for saving the planet — goals that may not be practical for many companies — we focus on each company's own ambitions and progress.
By focusing on company-specific targets, this report surfaces insights into how well companies are executing on their unique decarbonization journeys. These tailored insights reveal specific strategy, governance and execution variables that make the difference in whether companies are on or off track to succeed.
The research shows that supplier engagement efforts are on the rise, and as the large companies start to address Scope 3 emissions, they are leaning on their suppliers to set targets as well. Over time, this should cause a ripple effect as those suppliers lean on their suppliers to set targets and so on. We see this already coming to life in 2024, with more smaller companies setting emissions reduction targets.
Most companies aren’t just keeping commitments — they’re turning sustainability into a value creation engine. Organizations anticipate that by 2030 more than a third of their revenue will be derived from the climate transition. To get there, they plan to allocate a much higher portion of capital expenditures and operating expenses over the next five years to climate mitigation and adaptation as they reimagine their product lineups to capture the evolving customer demand for more sustainably produced goods.
The companies that effectively combine climate targets, product sustainability, and operational and financial commitments are positioned to realize the revenue and margin upside from addressing Scope 3 emissions that occur across a product’s lifecycle.
Our findings point to a recipe for how companies can help drive the outcomes that can create industry winners and losers. Four themes separate the leaders from the laggards:
Like last year’s report, our 2025 report shows that many companies are struggling to execute and make progress on their commitments. While there is good progress being made on Scope 2, only 46% are on track to hit Scope 1 targets and only 54% are on track to hit Scope 3 targets. But the real story isn’t one of retreat — it’s one of quiet, consistent action. While progress remains challenging, we see many executives doubling down on decarbonization as a strategic imperative, driving innovation, resilience and long-term competitive advantage.
Examining relative ambition against progress by industry sector against Scope 1 and 2 emissions reveals an interesting pattern. Companies with relatively more ambitious targets tend to be on track, while those that are taking a more conservative approach with targets also seem to be approaching their programs cautiously and are behind compared to their targets. This indicates that companies who have set more aggressive, often climate-aligned, targets are also establishing the governance, programs, and roadmaps needed to implement effectively.
Scope 3 remains an area of great opportunity, with relatively lower progress and ambition compared to Scope 1 and 2. Less correlation between ambition and performance suggests companies are earlier on their decarbonization journey.
Of the 6,895 companies who responded to CDP in 2024, over 4,000 have indicated climate commitments. That’s a nine-fold increase from five years ago. What stands out is that 37% of companies are increasing their ambitions while only 16% are decelerating their goals.
Those findings may be surprising given the headlines that amplify news of companies retreating on their climate commitments. But we are entering an era of quiet progress, where companies avoid publicizing climate pledges that can open them up to unwanted scrutiny and instead focus on making progress far from the spotlight.
A full 84% of companies we studied are standing by their climate commitments. We found a similar trend in our 2024 study, and it persists even when companies undergo a leadership change. We sampled 47 companies with Net Zero targets that experienced a CEO transition. None of those companies backed off their commitments.
Even among companies that have extended the time required to achieve their targets, there is typically a more nuanced explanation beneath the surface. A little over half are “recalibrating lower” their expectations and resetting lofty targets made in the absence of a detailed plan. Coinciding with the increase in CFO involvement which has brought greater rigor to the planning efforts, these companies are now equipped with a detailed climate transition plan and a clear-eyed view of what is achievable. For these companies, a lower ambition doesn’t mean they have deprioritized climate, and in fact, these companies may be allocating substantial resources against their climate goals, as seen in these case studies from Microsoft, Crocs and Unilever.
PwC's 2025 State of Decarbonization report shows that corporate sustainability initiatives aren’t slowing down — rather they’re quietly progressing and becoming more rigorous. Despite the noise about corporate backpedaling, more companies than ever, from industry giants to small suppliers, are making climate commitments and holding firm to their goals. And for good reason — there is business value available from climate and decarbonization efforts. While our report shows progress is being made on reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions, the real breakthrough is still ahead with Scope 3, where addressing supply chain emissions and prioritizing product and supply chain sustainability can help define a wave of business transformation.
Success in this new era won't be left to chance — it will likely turn on execution. Our findings suggest the recipe for success is coming into focus and that the coming years will separate industry winners and losers. The ingredients? Strong governance that integrates sustainability into decision-making and corporate strategy, consistent financing to turn climate commitments into climate action, extensive engagement with suppliers and customers to drive continuous improvements across the value chain, and a focus on product innovation to meet rising customer demand for more sustainable solutions. Companies that get this recipe right can reap the rewards: enhancing resilience, strengthening margins, expanding market share, and securing long-term competitive advantage. Those that embrace this approach can position themselves to not only meet their climate goals but create opportunities to redefine their industries, drive innovation, and position themselves as the market leaders of a more sustainable future.
PwC has defined an ESG framework with nine building blocks for a successful net zero transformation and decarbonization strategy across your business.
Learn why you need a Scope 3 emissions strategy now, how to engage your suppliers and why measuring and managing and reducing those emissions are critical.
The life cycle assessment process can help companies rethink their supply chains and produce low-carbon intensity products that customers are starting to favor.
Many companies make the mistake of only considering sustainability in the later stages of product development.