{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
December 2024
For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, all corporations, financial institutions, individuals, trusts, and estates doing business in Massachusetts and at least one other state must apportion their net income and, in the case of corporations, determine their non-income measure tax liability, using a single-sales factor apportionment formula.
In addition, recently enacted H.5077 prescribes an alternative apportionment method for those taxpayers whose sales factor is inapplicable that could apply an evenly-weighted formula using a taxpayer’s property and payroll factors to apportion.
The change to single sales factor may have a significant impact on the calculation of Massachusetts taxable income and Massachusetts non-income measure tax liability.
Affected taxpayers should consider modeling the impact of this change to ensure that their quarterly estimated tax payments are sufficient. Note that a corporation’s required first quarter estimated tax payment is 40% of the lesser of (1) 90% of its current year tax liability or (2) 100% of its prior year tax liability. Affected taxpayers also should consider the impact of this change on their future Massachusetts taxable income/tax liability and their utilization of tax attributes for provision purposes.
Massachusetts’ adoption of a single-sales factor apportionment formula could result in significant swings in the tax liability of a corporation that is neither a Section 38 manufacturer nor a mutual fund service provider, which applied a single-sales factor apportionment formula under prior law.
For example, a corporation with sufficient Massachusetts sales to have economic nexus, but no Massachusetts property and payroll would see its Massachusetts apportionment percentage double as a result of the state’s adoption of single-sales factor apportionment. Conversely, a corporation with large Massachusetts property and payroll factors but a small Massachusetts sales factor could see its Massachusetts apportionment percentage decline significantly.
Changes in the Massachusetts apportionment percentage as a result of the adoption of a single-sales factor formula not only will affect the amount of taxable income, but also will affect the amount of taxable net worth for those corporations classified as intangible property corporations. Further, the change in the apportionment percentage could affect a corporation’s classification as a tangible or intangible property corporation, which would affect the corporation’s non-income measure tax base. Tangible property corporations pay tax on the book value of their tangible property not subject to local property tax. Intangible property corporations pay tax on the book value of their apportioned net worth.
Observation: A retailer with a pre-2025 Massachusetts apportionment percentage that is higher than its pre-2025 sales factor and has considerable inventory in the state (which is exempt from local property tax) might flip from an intangible property corporation to a tangible property corporation in 2025 – assuming that there is no significant change in its sales factor in 2025 – as a result of Massachusetts’ adoption of a single-sales factor formula.
One interesting fact pattern addressed by the new legislation concerns situations in which there are no sales or the sales factor is otherwise deemed to be inapplicable. Massachusetts will deem a taxpayer’s sales factor to be inapplicable if (1) both its sales factor numerator and denominator are zero (even if the sales factor denominator is zero as a result of throw out), (2) the sales factor denominator is less than 3.3333% of a taxpayer’s taxable net income or (3) the sales factor is otherwise determined by the Department of Revenue to be insignificant in producing income. When this is the case, Massachusetts requires a taxpayer to apportion its net income and determine its non-income measure using an apportionment formula of Massachusetts property and Massachusetts payroll.
Observation: The new legislation directs the Department of Revenue to issue regulations to provide for the method of apportionment when the sales factor is inapplicable. The Department could follow the property and payroll factor rules that existed prior to Massachusetts’ adoption of the single-sales factor formula and could evenly weight those factors.
A corporation that reasonably expects that its Massachusetts tax will exceed $1,000 for the tax year is required to make four estimated tax payments of its required annual payment. The corporation’s Massachusetts tax for this purpose is the sum of its income and non-income measures of its tax liability, or in the case of a combined group, the sum of the income and non-income measures of the tax liabilities of its taxable members.
Generally, the required annual payment is the lesser of (1) 90% of the corporation’s current year tax liability or (2) 100% of the corporation’s prior year tax liability. However, the prior year tax liability exception is only available to large corporations, as such term is defined by IRC Section 6655(g)(2), for their first quarter estimated tax payment and only then if any reduction in the first installment payment caused by the use of this exception is made up by increasing the amount of the next installment by the amount of the reduction.
Massachusetts’ estimated tax payment rules require corporations to pay 40% of their required annual payment in the first installment, followed by 25% in the second and third installments, and 10% in the fourth installment. Because the estimated tax payments are front-loaded, with 40% of the required annual payment due with the first installment, it is important for corporations to be aware of the tax consequences arising from Massachusetts’ adoption of a single-sales factor formula to avoid any underpayment of estimated tax penalties.
Observation: Because Massachusetts treats overpayments applied to the next tax year as a payment made on the date that a return is made, which is one month later than the due date for the first installment for estimated taxes, corporations cannot rely on applied overpayments as a means to meet their first installment payment obligation.