Financial Focus 2022 | Part 2

Your IFRS 17 project and the pitfalls to avoid

  • Blog
  • 3 minute read
  • September 30, 2022

We’re in the home stretch! Yet, with less than a year left until implementation date, a significant proportion of our insurance industry across East Africa is yet to truly get stuck into their IFRS 17 projects.

IFRS 17 implementations are complex. Even for the simplest of insurance organisations, there is a lot to do.

Understand the requirements → get (or develop) an IFRS 17 engine → Integrate it to your systems → develop a new chart of accounts which is linked to your general ledger → the list goes on: cash flow models, actuarial models, expense systems, FP&A processes, accounting rules, transition, controls, business analytics...

Group of people discussing IFRS 17.

“Think very carefully about your IFRS 17 implementation approach and ensure that the various partners you work with (consultants, vendors, IT providers) are right for you and will not end up costing you more in the long run.”

The complexity of the standard itself is baffling decision makers and making it hard for many to kick off their projects on a right footing. If you are asking yourself some of these questions, read on.

  • Where should we start?
  • How do we identify the most suitable implementation partner?
  • Do we need to procure a tool? If so, when in the project?
  • How much do we need to spend?
  • What is the value in implementing IFRS 17?

Even if you haven’t yet started to prepare for IFRS 17, or you’re having doubts about whether your implementation programme will meet the deadline, there’s still ways to get over the line in time and comply with confidence. Below are some of our thoughts based on the wealth of experience working with clients locally and from the learnings of the projects across PwC globally.

Conclusion

With IFRS 9 implementation across East Africa, we saw many banks sit on the fence until the implementation deadline was looming ahead in just a few months. Some of these banks bought cheap, their implementation was half-baked and 4 years on they are still not happy with their models. They have spent money on patchwork updates or have simply thrown away their old and started afresh. The point is IFRS 9 implementation ended up costing them much more than they planned to, and they didn’t get the business insights they ought to have.

We must learn from this – think very carefully about your IFRS 17 implementation approach and ensure that the various partners you work with (consultants, vendors, IT providers) are right for you and will not end up costing you more in the long run.

Follow us
Hide

Contact us

Gauri Shah

Gauri Shah

Partner | Consulting and Risk Services, PwC Kenya

Tel: +254 (0) 20 285 5124