{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
IPO Services Leader, PwC US
John Gleason
Managing Director, PwC US
Doug Chu
Capital Markets Advisory Leader, PwC US
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, executives leading IPO hopefuls may be wondering:
Based on our experience and analysis of IPOs during election years, it’s our view that while the election may dominate the headlines, it shouldn’t be the main driver in the decision to go public.
With a few exceptions, annual IPO volumes reveal a pattern of relative consistency across election and non-election years, though there has been some impact on sector specific activity and IPO timing. In 2013, 2017 and 2021, for example, we saw slight upticks of activity follow elections as political uncertainty settled. This data includes SPAC IPOs, which had a significant impact on the market in recent years —especially 2021 — before activity began to decline substantially about a year ago.
IPO activity dips noticeably in the month of November during election years, suggesting that the election uncertainty leads companies to avoid launching or pricing a transaction.
The dip is even more pronounced during election week — with companies almost completely avoiding a pricing.
Some exceptions seem to arise in sectors sensitive to political discourse. The Healthcare sector, for instance, has shown variability in IPO activity due to political discussions over drug pricing and healthcare policies.
In 2024, unique economic, political and even technological factors could influence IPO sentiment more during this election cycle than in prior years. These include:
Despite the complexity of these factors, our advice to aspiring public companies remains consistent: They should focus on their fundamentals and how their IPO timing dovetails with a long-term capital plan. Likewise, prioritizing strong sales and earnings growth, assessing public investor demands and establishing financial statement integrity will all be time well spent for a company that wants to be proactive instead of reactive. In addition, it’s crucial to discuss all the considerations with collaborators that have a deep bench of knowledgeable experts.
Special thanks to Semir Krpo and Shahbaz Rajwani for contributing to this blog.