No matter the regulation, CFOs and ESG controllers need to be ready to disclose diverse metrics — from workforce conditions and extreme weather impacts to business ethics and greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2 and 3). This complexity underscores the need for efficient sustainability reporting strategies. Here’s what CFOs and their teams may consider:
- Avoid pitfalls in materiality assessments: Compliance with CSRD requires identifying material sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities through a double materiality assessment. While the financial component is still key, this assessment broadens materiality to include stakeholder and societal impacts. When scanning for risks and hidden dependencies, avoid these common pitfalls.
- Digitally-enable your ESG data reporting: Many companies struggle to realize value from tech investments. According to PwC’s 2024 Digital Trends in Operations survey, 69% of operations and supply chain officers say tech investments haven’t met expectations. CFOs and CIOs that get this right have a strategic opportunity to transform their decision-making process by grounding it in data that can be analyzed throughout the year.
- Build trust through strong internal policies, practices and controls: Your reporting strategy needs to include strong controls and policies to produce reliable and thorough data for regulatory compliance and successful audits. Keep in mind that many global disclosure regulations set deadlines for companies to secure independent assurance. Doing so can build trust among skeptical stakeholders. PwC’s 2023 Global Investor Survey found 94% of respondents believe corporate reporting contains unsupported sustainability claims, but 85% say reasonable assurance would boost their confidence in sustainability reporting significantly. Regulations often start with limited assurance but plan for a shift to reasonable assurance over time.
Our latest views on key global ESG disclosure regulations
Companies are on the cusp of disclosing more sustainability data than ever before, fueled by disclosure regulations and frameworks. Here’s our latest points of view on scoping, requirements and deadlines for three initiatives that your organization may be focusing on.
- The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive: The European Union’s signature sustainability regulation applies to some 50,000 businesses that are listed in the EU or have significant operations there, regardless of where they’re based. It requires them to report more about their sustainability performance than other pieces of regulation.
- California’s climate disclosure laws: Passed in 2023, these laws may likely apply to more than 10,000 US companies, including both public and private organizations as well as subsidiaries of non-US headquartered companies.
- The SEC’s climate-related disclosure rules: Adopted in 2024, but currently on hold, these rules significantly expand the required climate-related disclosures in SEC filings. The disclosures cover strategy, governance, risk management, targets and goals, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and financial statement effects.
Depending on where your company does business, you’re likely to encounter additional reporting requirements as individual states and countries worldwide develop their own regulations. A centralized, consistent reporting process is the most effective way to comply with diverse requirements.
PwC’s sustainability reporting adoption tracker can be a valuable tool. For companies that may need to meet multiple regulations, this tracker provides a country-by-country view of reporting frameworks, timing, scope and independent assurance requirements.
These sustainability regulations and standards can also impact your business
While the CSRD, California and the SEC grab most of the attention, there are other regulations and standards your company needs to understand. Here are a few examples.
European Union Taxonomy: The EU taxonomy is a classification system that aims to guide investors, companies and policymakers in identifying sustainable economic activities. The taxonomy sets out specific criteria that activities need to meet to be deemed environmentally sustainable, focusing on six key objectives: climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, transition to a circular economy, pollution prevention and control, and the protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems.
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD): The CSDDD establishes rules for most sectors and companies designed to protect human rights (e.g., prevent child labor and worker exploitation) and the environment (e.g., prevent pollution and biodiversity impacts) in its upstream and downstream global value chains. The CSDDD requires a company to take measures to prevent, end, or mitigate its impacts on the rights and prohibitions included in international human rights agreements and environmental impacts that run contrary to a number of multilateral environmental conventions.
Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): By applying a levy upon the importation of certain carbon-intensive products into the EU, CBAM seeks to level the playing field between these goods and potentially higher-priced EU products operating under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), which factors in the price of carbon. CBAM was designed to maintain the competitiveness of EU companies’ products against imports.
Australia’s climate disclosure law: The country’s disclosure requirements apply to both public and private entities that meet prescribed size thresholds. The disclosures will be determined by the Australian Accounting Standards Board. The largest entities in scope will be required to report in 2026 (on 2025 information). Phased-in assurance requirements begin with limited assurance on Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions from year one of reporting and advance to reasonable assurance of climate disclosures in 2030.
Many companies have set ambitious decarbonization goals. So why are so many off track?
Sustainability isn’t just a check-the-box endeavor. For many companies, it’s a potential game-changer for growth, innovation and resilience. Yet many organizations fall short in execution. Although today’s headlines seem to suggest that companies are backing away from their sustainability and climate efforts, a PwC study of 214 major publicly traded companies found that only 5% are slowing down their climate ambitions and, surprisingly, 37% were getting more aggressive. A full 90% of the companies studied were maintaining or accelerating their decarbonization goals.
Still, PwC research also uncovered a troubling reality. Ten out of 11 sectors are on track to miss their net zero targets unless they change course.
Here’s why so many companies are missing the mark.
- Not doing the right math: Leaders underestimate the data and resources needed, relying on high-level estimates that ignore shifting conditions and technologies.
- A focus on short-term wins: Many companies cherry-pick easy projects and defer the tough ones. Investment plans prioritize quick wins over transformative change, making the future achieving of decarbonization goals harder.
- Lack of strategic alignment and accountability: Poor coordination and under-resourcing lead to ineffective sustainability efforts.
The good news? There were plenty of companies in the study that had done the detailed planning to understand the initiatives needed to meet their targets, relied on internal carbon pricing to better prioritize their capex investments, focused on a mix of short- and longer-term wins and deployed an effective operating model to better manage the portfolio of decarbonization efforts. Not surprisingly, these companies were on track to reach their decarbonization goals.
Read our views on how companies can grow through decarbonization.
ESG regulations and your company
PwC’s Sustainability Reporting Guide
Worldwide impact of CSRD — are you ready?