Sinsiri
First of all, let me explain the concept of financial instrument classification. In addition to considering the business model, we must study cash flows generated by the contracts. Allow me to highlight the specific amendments mentioned previously. We must consider the principal and interest. The standard attempts to explain further what principal and interest payments are by looking at whether they reflect the debtor or issuer’s risk. If risk is reflected, the financial instrument passes the SPPI test. It’s consistent with a ‘basic lending arrangement’ where new features’ interest payments linked to other factors reflect the issuer’s risk.
Looking at new financial instruments that are also popular, such as green loans, principal and interest payments are linked to the issuer’s ESG (Environmental, social and governance) performance indicators. If they reflect the issuer’s risk, they meet the SPPI criteria.
Once financial instruments meet the SPPI criteria, investments can be measured using business models, classified at amortised cost or fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI), depending on the investor. If financial instruments linked to ESG don’t reflect basic lending arrangements or the issuer’s risk, they must be measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). This means the financial instruments must be measured at fair value in the financial statements.
For example, if on 31 December 2024, the value measured is THB100, and on 31 December 2025 the value measured is THB120, the difference of THB20 would be recorded in the income statement. If the financial instrument doesn’t meet the SPPI criteria, then it will be measured at FVTPL in the financial statements.