Vietnam report
2021 had shaped up to be one of the worst on record for cybersecurity. According to the recent Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2022 Insight Report, global ransomware attack volume increased by 151% within the first half of 2021. Similarly in Vietnam, the Vietnam National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) recorded 1,383 cyber attacks in the first month of 2022, a steep increase of 10.29% from December 2021.
To better fit the needs of the local market environment, this Vietnam report extracts relevant points from PwC’s 2022 Global Digital Trust Insights Survey, published in November 2021. It offers a guide to simplifying cyber with intention to address concerns that organisations have become too complex to secure and worry that too much avoidable, unnecessary complexity poses 'concerning' cyber and privacy risks.
Vietnam’s digital economy is projected to exceed US$43 billion by 2025 as the country continues to pursue projects in e-government, internet of things, smart cities, financial technology, artificial intelligence etc. With cyberspace blurring regional and national boundaries, Vietnam will likely face an increase in cyber threats, and sophisticated attacks.
In recent years, the Vietnam government had issued numerous regulations in its effort to strengthen the local cybersecurity landscape, including:
These efforts have yielded positive results given in 2020, Vietnam ranked 25th out of 194 countries in Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI). This ranking is a significant improvement from 2018 and 2017 when Vietnam was placed in the 50th and 100th positions respectively. In addition, this result exceeded Vietnam’s target to enter the GCI’s top 30 countries in 2030 as per the Prime Minister’s Decision No. 749/QD-TTg dated 3 June 2020.
This 2022 Global Digital Trust Insights Survey provides a guide for organisations to streamline their operations and processes consciously and deliberately. It focuses on four key questions, starting at the top with the CEO, to establish a unified approach to cybersecurity. These questions are often overlooked but, if properly considered, can yield significant results.
1. How can CEOs make a difference to your organisation?
2. Is your organisation too complex to secure?
3. How do you know if you’re securing your organisation against the most important risks to your business?
4. How well do you know your third-party and supply chain risks?
The top 10% reporting significant progress toward meeting important cyber goals1 — the most improved — are many times more likely to be doing the right things. Below illustrates the multiplier effect of simplifying cyber.
Our findings from the 2022 Global Digital Trust Insights Survey suggest an “expectations gap” for cyber:
Executives see CEOs getting involved in cyber when a crisis strikes. CEOs see themselves as more engaged.
CEOs believe they give ‘significant’ cyber support, but only 3 in 10 non-CEOs agree.
It’s time to close this gap between the chief executives and the others in the C-suite regarding the level of CEO involvement and support of cybersecurity. Unchecked, this gap can spell disaster if it instills a false sense of security company-wide, given the CEO’s leading role in defining an organisation’s culture.
CEOs have the power and potential to wield important cyber-related changes. In the “most improved” group of companies (those with the best cybersecurity outcomes the last two years), CEOs are 14x more likely to provide considerable support across all areas. The survey further points out executives in most regions and industries say the most important act for a more secure digital society by 2030 is educating CEOs and boards so they can better fulfill their cyber duties and responsibilities.
Cybersecurity’s mission is shifting to developing trust and business growth, with 54% framing it beyond cyber defense and controls.
Goals | Global | Asia Pacific |
Increased prevention of successful attacks |
No. 1 |
No. 2 |
Faster response times to incidents and disruptions |
No. 2 |
No. 3 |
Improved confidence of leaders in our ability to manage present and future threats |
No. 3 |
No. 1 |
In both CEOs and non-CEOs groups, “a way to establish trust with our customers with respect to how we use their data ethically and protect their data” was the number-one cyber mission choice. All agreed with prevention as the baseline, or most important; resilience coming next; followed by trust (including consumer trust: “improved customer experience” and “higher customer loyalty” rank further down the list).
Top cyber-ready goals for the next 3 years are:
The most worried about all this complexity are CEOs having assigned a complexity level of 10 to seven of 11 areas in their organisations. Other findings include:
75% of executives report too much avoidable and unnecessary complexity in their organisations, in their technology, data, and operating environments.
About as many believe that complexity leads to ‘concerning’ levels of cyber and privacy risks.
The “most improved” companies are 5x more likely to have streamlined operations enterprise-wide, with focuses on:
Simplifying cybersecurity, mainly cloud transformations, can help streamline business processes and IT architecture, provide flexibility and accelerate innovation.
Streamlined operations in the past 2 years covered:
Consolidating tech vendors (62%),
Defining/realigning the mix of in-house and managed services (60%),
Reorganising functions and ways of working (59%) and
Creating an integrated data governance framework (58%).
Each organisation's cybersecurity starts and ends at the highest level of management. 70% of surveyed executives agreed that the 2022 budget will be increased for cybersecurity. In face of heightened risks, cybersecurity should no longer be defined as just a matter of “internal controls”, but also a pivotal instrument to help organisations build trust with customers and support sustainable business growth.
Although organisations leaders recognise the value of verifying and safeguarding business data, data and intelligence are often overlooked in the decision-making process.
< 33% of respondents say they've integrated analytics and business intelligence tools into their operating model.
Only 35% have mapped all their data, meaning they know where it comes from and where it goes. The same goes for those who have mature data minimisation processes.
Data is the asset attackers covet most. Your companies can minimise that risk by minimising the target. Organisations first need to set up that good foundation we call data trust: making sure your data is accurate and verified and secure so you can rely on them for business decisions. However, only about a third of respondents report having mature, fully implemented data-trust processes in four key areas: governance, discovery, protection and minimisation.
This year’s findings show that executives underutilise data and intel for better decisions and risk management.
Only 30% consider real-time threat intelligence integral to their operating model.
Only 26% turn data into insights for cyber risk quantification, threat modeling, scenario building and predictive analysis — all critical technologies for smart cybersecurity decisions.
Fewer than 30% to benefit from today’s advanced intelligence tools and approaches such as information sharing platforms with industry, etc.
Businesses predicting an increase next year in their cybersecurity spending are often the same enterprises whose operational models use business intelligence and data analytics. Data cannot only help you spend your cyber budget wisely, it can also help you get more to work with. The most improved (top 10% in cyber outcomes) are 18x more likely to state that these advanced approaches are integral to their operating model.
Top list of anticipated targets | Types of attack most likely to see significant increases |
|
|
Work with the CISO in using risk-based, growth-oriented approach to cyber budgeting.
Get visibility from the CISO into the cost of breaches and incidents, as well as potential costs of exposure.
Build a strong data trust foundation: an enterprise-wide approach to data governance, discovery, protection and minimisation.
Create a roadmap from cyber risk quantification to real-time cyber risk reporting.
Don’t stop at cyber risks. Tie the cyber risks to overall enterprise risks and, ultimately, to effects on the business.
With a fuller accounting of cyber risks, identify what works in your business model and where you might need to simplify.
Most of our respondents have trouble spotting third-party risks - risks obscured by the complexities of their business partnerships and vendor/supplier networks. Our survey highlights that third-party cyber risks are a glaring blind spot:
Only 40% of survey respondents say they thoroughly understand the risk of data breaches through third parties, and only 37% profess an understanding of cloud risks based on formal assessments.
56% expect an increase in reportable incidents in 2022 from attacks on the software supply chain, but only 34% have formally assessed their enterprise’s exposure to this risk.
Today’s trending cyber-attack target may come from your supply chain of trusted vendors, suppliers and contractors. An organisation could be vulnerable to a supply chain attack even when its own cyber defences are good, with attackers simply finding new pathways into the organisation through its suppliers. The weapon? A process many have taken completely for granted: the software update. The organisations that had the best cyber outcomes over the past two years have consolidated tech vendors as a simplification move. Paring the number of tech and other third parties reduces complexity and increases your ability to know how secure they are.
Good practices to mitigate these risks include:
Reducing the number of third-party relationships,
Increasing the monitoring process
Deepening assessments of third parties
Map your system, especially your most critical relationships, and use a third-party tracker to find the weakest links in your supply chain
Scrutinise your software vendors against the performance standards you expect. Software and applications that your company uses should undergo the same level of scrutiny and testing that your network devices and users do.
After a fuller accounting of your third-party and supply chain risks, identify ways to simplify your business relationships and supply chain. Should you pare down? Combine?
Build up your technological ability to detect, resist and respond to cyber attacks via your software, and integrate your applications so you can manage and secure them in unison.
Establish a third-party risk management office to coordinate the activities of all functions that manage your third-party risk areas.
Strengthen your data trust processes. Data is the target for most attacks on the supply chain.
Educate your board on the cyber and business risks from your third parties and supply chain.
In Vietnam, few companies are able to comply with the requirements related to digital transformation, particularly those concerning the management of third-party cyber and privacy risks. Hence, the adoption of international standards and good practices are imperative for organisations to improve the effectiveness of supply chain management and minimize third-party risks.