Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) is no more just about complying with the regulatory requirements. Today it is more about embedding these principles across the business, from investments to sustainable innovation, to better manage risks and deliver sustained outcomes. The insurance industry has always been ahead in the game when it comes to understanding and securing risks, and the sector is fast realising the emerging risks of not embedding ESG in their core operations.
In the Asia Pacific (APAC) region, the push for ESG requirements has stemmed from the rising regulatory requirements, specifically in the insurance industry. The growing awareness amongst the territories is also attributed to the parent companies in regions where ESG maturity is higher.
PwC’s insurance industry ESG survey: Asia Pacific uncovers insights from business leaders across 12 territories in the region, including Australia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand. The focus is on key ESG issues the insurers are presently facing, what are the industry players thinking about and how they are responding to their concerns. It also highlights the readiness of the regional insurers in embedding ESG in their business and how they are developing datasets to benchmark against industry best practices. This survey report aims to guide insurance industry decision-makers on:
The majority of respondents (56%) have a high-level preliminary understanding of ESG requirements, and the preparedness is especially higher in countries like Singapore, Japan and Malaysia (Exhibit 1A).
This can be attributed to the fact that these territories have a strong regulatory push for climate risk management and ESG. Regulatory push is a strong impetus for territories to gain a preliminary understanding of ESG and its underlying requirements.
Respondents are also proactively taking steps to introduce ESG elements into their business (Exhibit 1B). Almost half of the respondents (49%) have integrated ESG considerations into their investment policies, 42% into their business strategy, and 42% into their risk identification process. Most of the respondents who have integrated ESG considerations come from Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand, where there is relatively higher regulatory push for ESG and/or climate risk management (Exhibit 1C).
Exhibit 1C: Regional overview - Integrating ESG considerations
The integration of ESG framework was assessed from the following perspectives: investment processes, product pricing processes and underwriting processes.
Respondents have highlighted that:
Scenario analysis for climate risk modelling is one of the critical requirements in embedding ESG considerations in risk management, reporting and disclosures. It is a key recommendation of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), which requires a company to understand and quantify the risks and uncertainties it may face under different hypothetical futures. This in turn helps to shape decision making and businesses strategy.
According to the survey, over one third (38%) of the respondents do perform climate scenario analysis or stress testing currently, while 29% more respondents are planning to do so soon. The main countries that perform scenario analysis include Singapore, Japan and Taiwan (Exhibit 3A).
The primary challenge currently faced by respondents is the availability of data for setting up appropriate scenarios and modelling to achieve meaningful analysis and insights (Exhibit 3B). Of the 38% of respondents who currently or plan to perform scenario analysis, only 52% considered themselves to have sufficient data to do so. If we look at a breakdown of countries where territories are deemed to have sufficient data to perform scenario analysis, Singapore emerges on top with 28% respondents in this category. This is an indicator that countries with strong regulatory push have caused organisations to be ahead in terms of data gathering requirements. However, the general sentiment within APAC is that the quality and availability of data is still in its nascent stage of development.
Another key challenge is timeline - 45% of respondents have not decided on a suitable time horizon for climate scenario analysis. This alludes to a “follow the leader” approach, where territories will be looking at the early adopters to implement scenario analysis or be waiting for more guidance from future regulations.
Majority of respondents are expecting to embed ESG considerations into their business strategy and operations within the next 1 to 3 years (Exhibit 4A).
Territories are looking into embedding ESG considerations in governance, strategy, risk management, metrics and targets. Only 4% of respondents have implemented all metrics considered.
In the area of governance, 35% of respondents are looking towards implementation in the next year, while 29% will implement in the next 2-3 years. In the area of strategy, 25% of respondents will look towards implementation in the next year, while 36% will implement in the next 2-3 years. The responses for both governance and strategy implementation are similar across the region - this can be largely attributed to the regulatory requirements that has come into effect in these various countries, as well as an increased in awareness for ESG requirements.
For risk management, 25% of respondents will look towards implementation in the next year, while 33% will implement in the next 2-3 years. For metrics and target, 20% of respondents will look towards implementation in the next year, while 35% will implement in the next 2-3 years.
Overall, the majority of respondents are looking towards implementing all aspects of ESG in the short-term within three years. The short-term timeline is a good indicator that most territories are aware of the looming deadline to start introducing ESG into the various aspects of their business.
With regards to technology and IT solutions, 46% of respondents have indicated that they have yet to assess the solutions available to support them in embedding ESG into business strategy and operations. Most of these respondents are from India, Philippines and Malaysia (Exhibit 5A).
In addition, majority of respondents (73%) desire for a globally aligned framework and interpretation rules for ESG reporting and disclosure. These respondents are primarily from Singapore, Malaysia and Japan (Exhibit 5B).
Exhibit 5B: Top-preferred solutions to implement ESG initiatives
Effective ESG frameworks can unlock a whole new world of opportunities for territories. As we can see in the survey, most insurers are getting started on this journey amidst growing calls for ESG compliance. Key takeaways for territories are to:
We have garnered 55 survey responses across the twelve territories, including Australia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand, in the Asia-Pacific region. The responses were from a range of life insurers (38%), non-life insurers (35%), reinsurers (13%), composite insurers (9%), captive insurers (2%), and others (4%).
Australia |
Brunei |
Cambodia |
China |
Hong Kong |
India |
Indonesia |
Japan |
South Korea Jun-Ho Lee |
Malaysia |
New Zealand |
Philippines |
Singapore |
Taiwan |
Thailand |
Vietnam |