November 20, 2020
Issue 2020-37
On November 19, 2020, the federal government enacted legislation1 to implement the Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy (CERS) and Lockdown Support programs; the legislation also modifies the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) program and extends the CEWS to June 30, 2021.
The CERS will subsidize eligible rent and mortgage interest expenses of businesses, charities and not-for-profit organizations that have experienced a reduction in revenue during the COVID-19 pandemic, and will be available from September 27, 2020 to June 30, 2021. The maximum subsidy rate available under the CERS for September 27, 2020 to December 19, 2020 is 65%, plus an additional 25% (the lockdown support) for businesses or organizations forced to temporarily shut down due to public health orders. Many of the criteria used to determine eligibility and calculate the CERS mirror those used for the CEWS program. The CERS will also use the same 4-week claim periods as the CEWS.
The legislation contains details of the CERS and Lockdown Support programs, as well as the revised CEWS program that will apply from September 27, 2020 to December 19, 2020 (i.e. claim periods 8 to 10 for the CEWS). Details that will apply after December 19, 2020 for both programs will be released later and are expected to be set by regulation and/or additional legislation.
The CERS program provides direct support to eligible entities that have experienced a decline in revenue during the COVID-19 pandemic, by subsidizing rent, interest on mortgages and other eligible property expenses. The program replaces the Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance (CECRA) program, which ended on September 30, 2020.
Similar to the CEWS, the amount available under the CERS depends on the revenue drop percentage experienced by the entity and uses the same reference periods for the “drop-in-revenues” test (see Table 2 in the Appendix). Details have been provided for:
The CERS is generally available to any entity that rents its premises, or owns the premises but has debt secured by a mortgage or mortgages on the property. The CERS may be claimed by a “qualifying renter” for a “qualifying property” when the qualifying renter has experienced a reduction in “qualifying revenue.”
A “qualifying renter” must:
Similar to the CEWS, the individual with “principal responsibility for the financial activities” of the entity must attest to the completeness and accuracy of each application.
A “qualifying property” is a real or immovable property (excluding any property or portion thereof used for residential purposes) that is used by the entity in the course of its ordinary activities.
The definition of “qualifying revenue” is also shared by both the CERS and the CEWS. Accordingly, any elections which an entity makes with respect to its qualifying revenue calculation (i.e. to compute revenue on a consolidated basis) must be used for both the CERS and the CEWS.
The revenue drop percentage is calculated as the decline in qualifying revenue, either year-over-year (general approach) or compared to January and February 2020 (alternative approach) (see Table 2 in the Appendix); once the entity chooses its approach, it must use the same approach for periods 8 to 10, and the same approach must be used for both the base CEWS and the CERS. An entity with a non-zero revenue decline is eligible for the CERS, but the subsidy rate for a given claim period depends on the revenue drop percentage, as discussed below. As with the CEWS, there is no legislative requirement to show that the revenue decline is caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
A qualifying renter’s rent subsidy for a qualifying period consists of:
An eligible entity’s “qualifying rent expense” for:
(However, no qualifying rent expense can be claimed in respect of an owned property that is used primarily to earn rental income.4)
Shortly after the CERS legislation was enacted on November 19, the Department of Finance proposed an amendment5 that, if enacted, would allow an eligible entity to claim amounts payable as qualifying rent expense, provided that:
For both rented and owned properties, qualifying rent expense is reduced by any rental income received from arm’s length third parties (i.e. sublease income).
For claim periods 8 to 10, a qualifying renter’s “rent subsidy percentage” for a qualifying period is, if the revenue drop percentage is:
An eligible entity is entitled to a rent top-up percentage of up to 25% (for periods 8 to 10), in respect of a location that has been subject to a “public health restriction” at any time during a qualifying period. The rent top-up percentage is prorated based on the number of days in the period during which the location was subject to the public health restriction.
A public health restriction is generally a mandatory order made under the laws of Canada, a province or territory that:
To qualify for the lockdown support, the eligible entity must qualify for the base CERS and, because of a public health restriction, have been forced to:
Accordingly, the total maximum rent subsidy percentage is 90% for periods 8 to 10, when an entity has suffered a revenue drop of 70% or more and has been subject to a public health restriction for the entire period.
See Table 1 in the Appendix for a summary of the maximum CERS and lockdown support subsidy rates for periods 8 to 10.
The new legislation extends the end of the CEWS program from December 19, 2020 to June 30, 2021, and modifies the program as follows:
See the Appendix for a summary of the maximum CEWS rates for active employees (Table 1) and the reference periods for the drop-in-revenues test (Table 2) for periods 8 to 10.
The CERS and Lockdown Support programs will benefit many businesses and organizations that have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and are having difficulty paying their rent or making their mortgage payments. The CERS program is a major improvement over the CECRA program, which was difficult to access because the landlord and tenant were required to agree on the rent deferral and the tenant was required to meet a 70% revenue reduction threshold. The general harmonization of the CERS with the CEWS will make compliance easier for retailers and other businesses claiming both subsidies.
The changes to the CEWS program generally benefit businesses by maintaining the total maximum CEWS rate at 65% for periods 9 and 10, and making the top-up CEWS more responsive to sudden changes in revenue, which also effectively reduces the complexity of the revenue drop percentage calculation. However, for periods 9 and 10, the maximum CEWS subsidy available for a furloughed employee has been effectively reduced, in most cases, from $847 to $500 per week.
1. Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy and Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy)
2. When an entity relies on this criterion, the Minister may demand records and other information to support the application. The Department of Finance has commented that the entity must satisfy the Canada Revenue Agency that it is making a “bona fide rent subsidy claim.”
3. An affiliated group of eligible entities must file an agreement to allocate the $300,000 limit amongst the group, otherwise the limit is nil for each member of the affiliated group.
4. An exception exists for properties rented to non-arm’s length parties that do not use the property primarily to earn rental income.
5. The Minister of Finance indicated that she expects the Canada Revenue Agency to apply this treatment administratively until the amendment is enacted.
Table 1 - Rate structure that applies in:
|
|||||
|
CEWS for active employees1 |
CERS and lockdown support |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERS base4 |
Lockdown support subsidy5 |
Maximum total rent subsidy if eligible for lockdown support |
|||
If revenue drop % is
|
≥ 70% |
65%2,3 |
65% |
up to 25%6 |
90% |
≥ 50% and < 70% |
40% + (revenue drop %3 - 50%) |
40% + (revenue drop % - 50%) x 1.25 |
up to 25%6 | 65% + (revenue drop % - 50%) |
|
< 50% |
revenue drop % x 0.8 |
revenue drop % x 0.8 |
up to 25%6 | 25% + (revenue drop % x 0.8) |
|
|
Table 2: Reference periods for drop-in-revenues test for:
|
|||
Period |
Qualifying period |
General approach1,2 |
Alternative approach1,2 |
---|---|---|---|
8 |
September 27 to |
Greater of:
|
Greater of:
over average of January and February 2020 revenues |
9 |
October 25 to |
Greater of:
|
Greater of:
over average of January and February 2020 revenues |
10 |
November 22 to |
Greater of:
|
Greater of:
over average of January and February 2020 revenues |
1. An eligible entity or employer must use the same approach (either general or alternative) to determine the revenue drop percentage, for:
2. For the top-up CEWS, the general and alternative approaches in the table apply starting in period 8 (previously, for periods 5 to 7, the general and alternative approaches were based on the average revenue drop for the preceding three months). A safe harbour rule will apply, so that an eligible employer will be entitled to the top-up CEWS rate that they would have calculated under the approach used for periods 5 to 7, if that rate is higher than the rate calculated using the approach in the table. |