At PwC Canada, trust is core to our mission and is key to our ability to be more resilient and accountable and offer sustainable impact for our stakeholders. But we know that for us to help organizations build trust, we need to be trusted and accountable ourselves. And while we do have a long-standing reputation for trust through our financial reporting and compliance work, we know we need to do more. Like all organizations, we need to stay ahead of rising expectations around issues like transparency and community impact as well as key global trends—such as increased skepticism and declining confidence in institutions—that are making trust a critical business imperative.
To hold ourselves accountable, we set out to learn everything we could about the tangible and intangible factors that contribute to trust. From there, we created a framework that identifies what drives trust in our organization, the situations where trust matters most and the metrics we can use to ensure we’re living up to our purpose and values. We’re outlining our journey below as part of our efforts to further build trust and are encouraging other organizations to do the same by applying this process to themselves.
We know that trust is a nebulous entity. It takes time to build and can be lost in an instant. And it’s not static as trust goes up and down with every action, interaction and output. With this complexity in mind, we set out to research everything we could about why people put their trust in us so we can make changes to ensure positive impacts and change behaviours where our actions could be eroding trust.
The first stage of our research was to develop a better understanding of our stakeholder landscape. By examining current marketplace expectations and reviewing best practices for stakeholder identification, we could see how society’s changing expectations are transforming who we need to engage with to earn trust. Our findings revealed a diverse range of stakeholders, including our clients, educational institutions, governments, the investment community, marginalized communities, the media and our people.
Once we had identified our stakeholders, we undertook a materiality assessment on trust agenda topics, which helped us tailor our primary research to capture sentiment in key areas. We then commissioned a series of surveys with the public, clients and our people to understand their views on trust in our brand and the work we do every day.
One of the key findings from engaging with our stakeholders was how personal trust is for them. The discussions revealed that trust is measured by individual and collective thoughts and feelings about our intentions and is calculated against how well we embody competence (the quality of our actions and behaviours), consistency (actions that match our intentions) and integrity (behaviours that match our commitments) in everything we do, especially when things go wrong. This is one of the reasons why our trust journey goes beyond reporting on environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters to ask stakeholders how well our everyday actions and behaviours match our commitments.
Building on these overall findings about our stakeholders and their sentiments about us, we delved further into the data to pinpoint the top drivers of trust in our firm. This required us to work with our advanced analytics team to analyze sentiment across 45 different trust drivers to identify the issues that matter most to our stakeholders and assess how we perform against them. This gave us a list of drivers with a confirmed impact on trust.
We also looked at how our competitors and the marketplace are performing relative to our firm on the specific trust drivers we identified. This helped us identify any areas where we lagged our competition, needed to protect an existing competitive advantage or may be vulnerable to others surpassing us with relative ease.
We then assessed how our various trust drivers relate to each other, which was key to uncovering opportunities to maximize the efficiency of our trust-building efforts and impacts. This helped us prioritize one potential driver over another since any improvements would have impacts in related areas as well.
The ultimate result of this analysis was our top trust drivers and disclosures, which we’ve divided into three categories (prioritize, building momentum and table stakes) below:
1. Prioritize: Addressing blind spots that erode trust and require consistency and integrity in our actions
2. Building momentum: Maintaining trust around our core competencies
3. Table stakes: Disclosing our progress on the issues our stakeholders care about most
To provide a framework for trust and hold ourselves accountable, we’re focusing on key performance indicators that assess how well we’re doing across our top trust drivers:
By using these KPIs to identify areas where we're doing well and where we need to do better, we’ll have deeper insights into how we can make further progress across our top trust drivers. We’re also committing to an ongoing process of evaluating and measuring trust and plan to reassess what’s really important to you—our stakeholders—on a regular basis. It’s all part of our focus on continuously improving our actions and interactions at every level of our business.